IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Supporting lisp-geo [Was: Re: lisp - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 115]

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 03 November 2022 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFFBC152595 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VbD0sfI46zg8 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4196AC152594 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 07:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id z14so2939893wrn.7 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WD9jV32jnDorB0Dj/4Z+JxyUmM+rHUg2WuD0h3WFS8Y=; b=Bir9FYZzhNF6IQkNPAMH94X+UmotkfBmQX5yP/kkc+Ax8SyH1IYyjlkxKgSKixpi7K vefvy2/lq/934nLktGTi4HqMxMzRAYeTKgTQZEHK7cx9YvnF/mp3Y0k7JkprLMAagTF3 O6z/2JnFCeyapwsmbHaHxbakW1I6eLHBARF8xdNiG7MbRVgT2uKIeRKcz1uDTfXQCA52 GNemds326RmvthGiSp1cxJCfJYNF5Bu51hCE0AvNB4SrB+fTv2yseiBhErDqIaIhQgGg MX+EGvmZJRL6DJjGYxXkv2i9uVvF98BtTPT7CuWjBEX71I/Dd3/1B6NegVJ4nOcM56TG ub/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WD9jV32jnDorB0Dj/4Z+JxyUmM+rHUg2WuD0h3WFS8Y=; b=1KxTkUegc13UKbdpLCfypyrL0Xmkgdx2aqy07Wp8kZ2Wvv3gJjzqil6O63bsvCS+ZA /rbHrJphVADd29/ZxLgA8dxlTrw70v2tT/RGIUqbGwQNTa/1fqEXIxjDvIYtPZ11dRPX ew0AxFI3O+hLcPy6zOCXAcgzzUdVtdpOCuof3O3r15dR3vxsIeknGAUOoTqHLHIZySaK 1OoOKCB0fHvNlRiVezfKidpYSRGW3oKOKRTblOkDz+JKTnwE/yZkXlN2YzdxbVx1nt8w WRiqHtBl60+C1cj6WACEgPlcnaoTKdNI99bKWAb2+2CKVWCtsaTgVJnWcjHo7IbNva6H EuJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2O8Rp7HPVZ4POoajvRWiuRKaSehX4uMBM5G0pc6q90skjq3JWK Okw61E1/kB9q9Nz/Il+HEqsdNQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5pD6pXb5AMmryxeKMHsd8QFx1EvklijuofRAOsqFf2ZX1T6j4KBehPzDC2tZCy3BphEpuNHg==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f78f:0:b0:236:992b:1f62 with SMTP id q15-20020adff78f000000b00236992b1f62mr18400277wrp.605.1667484491954; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 07:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a01:e0a:1ec:470:25aa:24c5:2560:50e6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o21-20020a05600c4fd500b003c71358a42dsm6730538wmq.18.2022.11.03.07.08.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 07:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <2B546E1C-413F-4744-937C-3D930CA6770D@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7F153603-4B7B-4CA5-A51B-DBF44C949ECE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.200.110.1.12\))
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:08:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <0AA53AAC-419F-456B-8D88-AD81A1910FD6@getnexar.com>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
To: Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <5B4B1037-5DFE-4944-81F1-6F8AC0624D8C@cisco.com> <0AA53AAC-419F-456B-8D88-AD81A1910FD6@getnexar.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.200.110.1.12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/dGDAE-6yvYieD-g7kIRikSiztLA>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Supporting lisp-geo [Was: Re: lisp - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 115]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 14:08:15 -0000

Hi Sharon,

About draft format and style it is not up to us (LISP WG chairs) to decide that.

Your request should be submitted to: https://datatracker.ietf.org/rfcedtyp/rswg/about/

Good luck ;-)

Ciao

L.



> On 3 Nov 2022, at 11:18, Sharon Barkai <sharon.barkai=40getnexar.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I agree Fabio, it is well written!
> 
> However, if it will become at some point acceptable to submit drafts in bullets, along with masks and headers, and flow diagrams (still pure currier) ,  it will make life a lot easier for non native english speakers :)
> 
> --szb
> Cell: +972.53.2470068
> WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794
> 
>> On Nov 3, 2022, at 00:45, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <fmaino=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Chairs, 
>> I would like to support Dino's request for WG adoption of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-geo/. 
>> 
>> It's a well written document that defines the Geo-coordinate LCAF type. The draft brings up a couple of good use cases that illustrates how the LCAF type would be used. 
>> 
>> It's a fairly simple document, and I can't think of anything that I would do differently. I'm also supportive of getting this to last call as soon as IETF procedure allows. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Fabio 
>> 
>> On 10/15/22, 10:37 AM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" <lisp-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   And I would like to request WG document for draft-farinacci-lisp-geo again. It has been around for a long time and has an LCAF encoding code point in RFC 8060. I can present this draft too in London. 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status