Re: [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal
"Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <darlewis@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64D01A8823 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:37:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozAIMXpTnXnt for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:37:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4431A8865 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:37:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=442; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446568660; x=1447778260; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=OBTWFFsrGYH39sdGofuKeYWzdSFPXlH0UkYNgUpPPNw=; b=HiOg4F1vGckKI+Az1mF+2zNWOUNnXGn+f2DCGTKySuBDRvSqH8aaB91E 9ljdabuZleHI8BfC0fwMlsQ/w1Gg29jbM9q6F6JM2UOHNl/6BL2dxRWyZ Ly9YyJpK+8/EowKpVa5caeZbwbUyPhptq/XV3/OlQKWNH7SGIesld8h/2 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQDS4ThW/4ENJK1egzuBQga7IIIqAQ2BXYYUAoE8OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENgEBBDo/EAIBCDYQIRElAgQOBYgZAxK9TA2EJAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARiGZIIQgm6CU4FhJYNOgRQBBJZGAYsugXSUbIdRAR8BAUKEBHKENEOBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,239,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="43548313"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2015 16:37:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA3GbdVK003877 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:37:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:37:38 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com ([173.37.102.28]) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com ([173.37.102.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:37:39 -0600
From: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal
Thread-Index: AQHRFlXzL7ZOZElg1kyFz4C8M3JtGA==
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:37:39 +0000
Message-ID: <A5F36599-D862-41AF-92FE-94FE4245014F@cisco.com>
References: <f02960a2f1234e9cba653318dcf0be44@XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com> <754E7621-099C-4A75-95D8-EA41F4A512C0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <754E7621-099C-4A75-95D8-EA41F4A512C0@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.253.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <58B971C6B51FCF45AC3CF79D5A2B12E2@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/dlJYxw0kVXAI0RrmCrO4SwsQ9d8>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:37:46 -0000
On Nov 3, 2015, at 5:59 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> - is RTR shared across LISP sites behind NAT or each site needs a dedicated RTR > > Yes, we envision that millions of xTRs can use the same set of RTRs (i.e. a pair of RTRs that are topologically close to each other and the xTRs that are using them). Well, a given RTR is limited by the # of destination UDP ports available. -Darrel
- [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal Amjad Inamdar (amjads)
- Re: [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal Sharon
- Re: [lisp] LISP NAT Traversal Darrel Lewis (darlewis)