Re: [lisp] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-11: (with COMMENT)
Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Wed, 01 June 2022 12:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B05C14CF0D for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 05:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E_jlNaRBztcS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 05:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285BEC14CF07 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 05:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id e25so2070584wra.11 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 05:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=TsFtw3paJhoICs0o+mN9Ne7/n3gJWRGhok+93FIUwLQ=; b=AAgC/uf0Uqp0VLZeA999BKbjJQFTXxIXGR9rPpVpgBKO+zByHkgezX4ZgqwdnCUdUq TYaCbo7i5aARO4BFbdI6N79Bga736sZn6HJpW3o4bZSI+Nvp0BFTYJcK0bZG1mz1aY1F /3L3hWF++uKehSDXRTdPqpxAEXDUYB4d5zUYUBQyLBuex+SQ9jRrJU/+rzyUQm/DVNNm ar9yh8HVtgQpEDItzJFC1hgotHjRt4dR83G1Fhy+izGrGsChPmRtqw48lEB9DolFtcLA r5A0Rsznj8KtTC9NizenIDBpb8sgZrQ3FJ7+qRNSe82wyGWyDji7vwRA6clweAGep3hE fe6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=TsFtw3paJhoICs0o+mN9Ne7/n3gJWRGhok+93FIUwLQ=; b=t10Ny6AtUj8d9QLnSDILtt9NkMcKYfL5avpsbab5p80ikum2cMNr6Fiodey2OPSPHk h2cm+fMqHE5Oz4I8gNqFqQC53MfLSghff0HbZbmLhb3OBdRibm5ky7V6K02w6f6atMln g1X4kJih31iPh6UdSjMYgE4Bi556g42UfrORwlHg4FYfPQXnFQaslb+8sh6BBrzK/mb4 5v5mrf/HyTM340lQWhqdqprhsiyqiRh/0L4iFnJ/BkNy3zIFo1WNCCQugAqTdHkcz7+4 Lj+zeQE7rmZyeyjXH77BmiosUp0trIFVGw7urd9UCRHhWw8NXpOdlDXxQNAndAqCxUFb Hkyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531F+WDpK7jOvUb7NAJDPSCwtL4s7WX+TV5gi1TAojhn5ga5q/AN MRLwxPraD4ZomfElBSjbQXak0A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAtOfR0+2FOdlvGEaNfTXpypihIH9JZ9e7Smm1F7TwibPrEBN54i7xFVWeKKwTs16MS4DeTA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4646:0:b0:210:3e3c:86dc with SMTP id j6-20020a5d4646000000b002103e3c86dcmr2741378wrs.277.1654085726568; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 05:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([37.166.188.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p14-20020a05600c204e00b003974b95d897sm4985556wmg.37.2022.06.01.05.15.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jun 2022 05:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <9DFFB5D0-2B43-46C6-9160-545BA40E41D4@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_814DC818-34B9-4546-A104-B1E9848C0094"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 14:15:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3595A75A-8103-4AAD-B49A-FB62F7D8D76E@gigix.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <165405547548.21676.16532222998072255765@ietfa.amsl.com> <3595A75A-8103-4AAD-B49A-FB62F7D8D76E@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/exJyHHUDv_BD7aiQ_BTeR5kuAfc>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 12:15:29 -0000
Hi Erik, The reference to RFC1982 has been added: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-12.txt <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-12.txt> Thanks again for the pointer. Ciao L. > On 1 Jun 2022, at 10:12, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote: > > Thanks Erik, > > I wasn’t aware of this RFC, I will add the reference. > > Ciao > > L. > >> On 1 Jun 2022, at 05:51, Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-11: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> # Internet AD comments for {draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-11} >> CC @ekline >> >> ## Comments >> >> ### S6 >> >> * Consider adding a reference to RFC 1982, which goes into this at >> greater length. >> >> >> >
- [lisp] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-li… Erik Kline via Datatracker
- Re: [lisp] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-iet… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-iet… Luigi Iannone