IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 28 August 2018 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F656130E15 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x_kVtqJF3SXZ for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188EB130E07 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id n2-v6so2307332wrw.7 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xaLdFpVF9n0eVn1pAJOgQ4tnAnLsBw1xOfDn6oXGn9M=; b=IQl+Btg2BVHw1HsiTGEQDS6IMHa5YNy6dW6e1HOUZAGryBIFXpgN5x236CGpBwVJpb YAV5t7UZii13Jj4XD3s7nBsE0HXRGfAxz7rZ0RB3m82m3PcDNd/cqOfQ4Yti9TlaJn8B wWNa3+xSBwaeF/pv8ZsHkAj2JHHA1yBeE60ANM3yZ8OR/FkT2fkfnVtc8byOb0I3sqS7 V3zh54VpOSr1/WutUe/7k8vEa6PY3vlsbDO4JRMw5eCLpUidWnB6GFGBLxSaW1tOV8sh LIRIHvfgdkpIMuz8uGMWgFwgTqg6lhcaxYLY8otCdpnV7D+XQ1KRy8MBDr8AbTrp5fAb kPyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xaLdFpVF9n0eVn1pAJOgQ4tnAnLsBw1xOfDn6oXGn9M=; b=kwBeEo5wW6M9bMnDv3L1Ork2VPNNZrm32mkzXFgNFFSZt0ikBPekX8lcMLnXGd1c4I gcmLHwScD4snbIsNfgZigbSiN7l+IFZ1KdCuEWqIYhwRxHWdOiYeOFF4wSyceI16UTCq MBq5BAsU2b/Vuqu+XDaYrDEn61FciHHQmvYQ21g8jT+JMphR2Pui+3W3Ux5oyvGFB/Rm foeuc+z85OFiAl8HsXXRO32DjDaT69Vxp9vL/ZyjmkQF0ypAGCjQQrRotCnHDnqvaFcr DQ9Os5Ew0rzpO/+dyVE/lgSZpq9osK4m/sXYjCsNgC9m9eeccuka1y/fJ51d8G7ATAKJ 4B7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DdlEXgvB/cDtXNcLsyiju53MNbp5pqoo5IV9hb3BGDxu6fxumn BxKTnHD+jr2hSnSfYReYsdzTsIDRx/g+WKkb8BsBcA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdb2Q5fgVzjAcayvsvgvi0aMZ0DQBLsh5ovTeuPIgSGnHBEj6BCnfS4ZwbJunrdieroJ+hiUaUP3IbOH4kiO+iI=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:608b:: with SMTP id w11-v6mr1898880wrt.193.1535477283203; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153546084779.23731.3772960451880909496@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <153546084779.23731.3772960451880909496@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:27:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKpqnMOYAELPbRC75_6n5QwjUjm6YpZ3J5j9kLRUotTog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Cc: ops-dir <ops-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis.all@ietf.org, IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006f1160574822a7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/f4iCM7P3GJNQ9dMKB_m2WkrHpi8>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:28:07 -0000

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:54 AM Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote:

> Reviewer: Scott Bradner
> Review result: Ready
>
> I performed an OPS-DIR review of The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
> (draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16) This ID is the result of a bifurcation of
> RFC
> 6830 as such review of the basic technology is OBE. (i.e. RFC 6830 was
> published years ago – any deep technology review should have been done
> then.)
> The ID does make some changes to the technology described in RFC 6830 but
> the
> changes do not present any operations related issues that I can see.
>
> The version I was asked to review did not have a “Changes since RFC 6830”
> section (as all RFCs that update or obsolete other RFCs should have) but
> that
> has been fixed so I have no additional issues.
>

Excellent, thank you Scott, and the authors.
W



>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-DIR mailing list
> OPS-DIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email