IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 18 September 2018 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E21130E22; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fr8WDBfVIj5w; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CF1130E0A; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id s15-v6so1321848pgv.8; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gn05nwKF6kRjRKeWuKdudBvM44x++VzwootuERThc0w=; b=sAWiEYofdmmXJ4WiodPSEghjgb0sshR5OoRJ3EQYq53FqGMV4WgvAz4HfBQLGaIjCX GVxYtJ/3iLteGUHO4isrrcY0y7TiB8WvTa9pFNY4vRieleZOI3p0meWXRxHZgo7z3ZZH Qz7+QKItunPZuyKhnsQFY2xtEVNUcL14wFPPTg/aByGjKHE7lC/B4jVPt3zsII38zyl2 rzSAU52k1XBSayPjbk20V+fV/uQsVsxVSbBq+alKVB16/BlKnwMw71KBdxngqHDmDbTy P2kVwqHCbzIHyTUY75DgiYd0vADAvJU/jn450PDlIQfi0yvYNeibv4RRE0S3tkTT2lxN vkww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=gn05nwKF6kRjRKeWuKdudBvM44x++VzwootuERThc0w=; b=WA3lFsiyJaZhHciae7UbooYjZRGBEy7t3wAhTdAZkMqsxLNasXPYVccoCZYTr254jA XUMnTdU1Xc2o90JDTGrg24PI4tj8wop8kskY9a4ZPyxbRX08hn9zO6uT5MUJhlcI2RLU +n+HXcnP9WqPNoBuF9AHRd/fjuPgK21ZvWwX3hrtn9wVMBL2mUfCWFRQEqUrkyNme32v 1oTOxVQPW5bFIZ2BEAnmhUygzZ2TJkom+xqCPcHmT3udOtOfqTNn7k01SpS4At3LpwEv i0p9ADg7xoLLty47zE0tgXYEogpoY4rlo8d3y7hPGxF9xXKqAh19xAC2zb5L5lqVwTdn J3vA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51ApbDDLQXO16SQM2Yf++DG7rOOVcUphL9F9Zz+YAsHVqnNehb0P lCrgSDBsiSvmusluxuP/VGI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbeiXKzE5CCvfyj1ZbobzVhU1ktUNdeWCHuZQhb/osBKN5AZogAguCqJ5EhCCojFiLFLZB35w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:df4e:: with SMTP id h14-v6mr28541909pgj.300.1537289692262; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.32.182] ([65.154.156.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l79-v6sm33862695pfi.172.2018.09.18.09.54.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <523C5B6B-12C8-4B67-B67D-A445D9C57E28@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:54:50 -0700
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE8D0858-CC87-470C-9536-253D2A8BE166@gmail.com>
References: <153667905625.16761.12157659372502604927.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7DEBCA24-9D55-4325-85AA-48AB3FAAB91D@gmail.com> <0201F06C-DA9E-445A-A995-54BA805B595C@kuehlewind.net> <DDA9C261-44DD-4389-9463-3A84E4C176BB@gmail.com> <5EC21C57-D217-48A9-AFD0-24710299CF7F@kuehlewind.net> <5A3C4B1F-EA31-4698-96F4-915A77400A56@gmail.com> <2CAF25CC-01EE-49D4-B970-F8EFB24940A8@kuehlewind.net> <D4593D6E-19F0-48B4-917D-A755FD4C7B4E@gigix.net> <523C5B6B-12C8-4B67-B67D-A445D9C57E28@kuehlewind.net>
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/fFpfKLiPBhESdu082S7FdbNUAoA>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:54:55 -0000

>> 
>> “Extension to the LISP header described in this document can be achieved using the LISP General Protocol Encapsulation mechanism [draft-ietf-lisp-gpe].“ 
> 
> Yes, that would be sufficient. I’m actually wondering with this draft was not directly included in 6830bis.

I thought we (the WG) made a decision to not reference lisp-gpe in 6830bis. It is not referenced now.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email