IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 02 February 2016 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007F91B3017; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GRvJt5MP0siz; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:48:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A191B3014; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 11:48:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o185so105557067pfb.1; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:48:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KysNCALh9nAqHwD2kCnN8b1IhfNc5IXwE4wG/oZPH1Q=; b=XOE/N3KB+dxhmffLJWBJl/o1jC8u8OlceJh3j+eltT1tUSWgKTvXJT1KuoPwZ4r6us Kp86/78tINvOzbu4T7dL78nhBgGaPNKmGR4BahwC5oW+ofMdsowy/vcdKUzlzXZUC6nQ sF87gmCQ+uhBDwhRjT9GppjA3XbDw97fKT+0pTnOU4rBrPX8NpNZ0aBrmkwbDywABL9l 3gJoEQxuOedB49Qq/Ccp7hUwKpK/K1WmVDu5YLXvku2yI9rKh0+aJjZMT72odTmf5O9x hlH0QaPf8R7nGMK03QthmscOqilmYZ9yh7m2C4MEIUMTcQ5PpihdG191EduA/JJlxdHq iGaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=KysNCALh9nAqHwD2kCnN8b1IhfNc5IXwE4wG/oZPH1Q=; b=LKPrnqZymmgLXbTtTdEEJJyoa5Qz8r+qx9OuQf+o7Z1LNRzjxYMiUvZdJJBV5LBRDn A/3fHCYoWuWhFo/38UEeIxYr56x9W3PrtUzNSmyBgpLLykikX+LE14QWuEGzBSXRTgzz GtPyQfQJ4MiA0r5qyJqoiv9hjKZxdgoX0JQ2TION6flVuJ6tKSoklsgp7SRP+F6Z9phK vPD+Q/fENlBQAo/1Kn7vKgJwzyudXuJks+6ZxM9SCGPXMsLAH38x+JJKxdCLGFbbvlEe n0CjFEnmtI0uRz/L6Y8gafpXpUYk+0vjSDc+L6AOf3OnoxZ4zXoKfekwq63UPs2Bp7NQ jqHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ2NNheMnY8CBy70UE9JDbs5EW7E5eYrCVZZ9+Y4KqXwFyUnlcohW6pqWwAuMLJlQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.44.66 with SMTP id s63mr50192286pfs.2.1454442495302; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:48:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p20sm4441450pfi.86.2016.02.02.11.48.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56B105BC.7090200@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 11:48:13 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6846BA18-08AC-453E-896C-1238D3BE3E3F@gmail.com>
References: <20160202163941.8955.70959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56B101BB.6030802@joelhalpern.com> <92DC39B5-F1EC-4EB6-94D7-8AAC5C65611E@gmail.com> <56B105BC.7090200@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/fVP5A5GrXxj3CcIuL3fGRLZlWtg>
Cc: lisp@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:48:17 -0000

> Yes, we did RFC 6831.  As far as I know, no one in the WG plans to make any enhancements to that or its interaction with PIM.

Agree. RFC6831 was designed and written to interwork with existing PIM/IGMP multicast deployed at LISP sites.

Dino

> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 2/2/16 2:23 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> the multicast work is reflective of a series of drafts on which the working group is pretty close to agreement on a replication engineering draft and a signal free draft.  The replication engineering draft mentions PIM, but does not modify or affect it in any way.  And signla-free is separate from any other working group effort.
>> 
>> And there is RFC6831. It mentions PIM in a big way.
>> 
>> Dino
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email