Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

"Lorand Jakab -X (lojakab - AAP3 INC at Cisco)" <lojakab@cisco.com> Mon, 09 July 2018 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lojakab@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABB130DE9; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nsCe2afP587; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF9F127332; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3336; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531177509; x=1532387109; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=4pTDwsieqTwm4YIlulw4Q6bRVDUgkRJpXwaqFRcSxDc=; b=U1vAdMoGrdLcvWFvdfiFdXsLZNxJLcCLYass1PVVYeCAF6rDfk7l7ngI jeoIhsAvEKODD6hGDbtPgBWaAgod8BCL1b0mP8ctgwYmIstwrSKD/nlGH b5Ak7n2M5fQIaEkJFjVQZ07wr4EjzZlog+zCXVFyddmndLMZEPbB+Twzh s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AtAQBH6UNb/5FdJa1dGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEIAQEBAYNJYn8oCot0jDSSK4UOFIFmCyOESQKCRSE0GAECAQECAQECbRw?= =?us-ascii?q?MhTcGHVwQAgEIBAoxBzIUEQIEDgWDIAGBG2QPq3OEW4NxgTUFiG6CFYE2gmi?= =?us-ascii?q?DGAEBA4EqAQ8CAgGDUIIkAplPCQKGBokcgUKEDoZ2gReKOIcxAhEUgSQdOGF?= =?us-ascii?q?xcBVlAYI+ixSFPm+NY4EaAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,330,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="421245444"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jul 2018 23:05:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w69N58qd022341 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:05:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:05:07 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:05:07 -0500
From: "Lorand Jakab -X (lojakab - AAP3 INC at Cisco)" <lojakab@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
CC: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
Thread-Index: AQHUFREBDXWSHSZ260mTIPnwKDAa9aSH3D6A
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <C39FCB54-A908-4C4B-B6A8-6CD3DB6D2ED6@cisco.com>
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.144.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C39FCB54A9084C4BB6A86CD3DB6D2ED6ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/fmz9TiW9I73lt5T7Q9Q2W-Md3RQ>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 23:05:12 -0000

On Jul 6, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:

Folks,

As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).

Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end July 20th, 2018.

Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.

I reviewed the document and I think it is ready to be handed to the AD.

-Lori

If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.

Thanks

Luigi & Joel