IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-06: (with COMMENT)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 28 September 2018 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5C9130DFB for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zoOmepOeJ8nl for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F45130DF1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id s12-v6so1120326wmc.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8PXVbeoPzz13myqb8p6Vh/uIeSc2l3jqSDvIOEDEHG4=; b=F9WIzR1pmLinDywvDpJG9ecGKa0EUqymKIMxci/GZVj6q7BMJ3mc7++8dPpRFAOcU0 ruoJE/ElZT+SzwdIEr27+Lv/jjMlHEPRrJwiHkVPdBeovJyTJKIMI7kUBY3yli8p5UHy bhcWcp45+TQCuqxwx5FcbAeKOo7kp9krQRdDKCX2drAbg90NHv5adbfzsDJeaNwxf8XE O2zVS4S685Px2aL1del5aqWqpL26EVi0+c+8RYKiYudseRL++UR4RqI/LTkXFKI/lTff Gy6P3IZmnPBZoPKZHQ4c1gBlK6Py4EFVnmUHzx+l0gBRaudUlBg3yv0v9HuYtTAILaRt qQnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8PXVbeoPzz13myqb8p6Vh/uIeSc2l3jqSDvIOEDEHG4=; b=OK52P1OdzT2bt8lq/g97amFpT70cYc3oXEoRYiLNL8JXMjQuAGeN8/+MvjMZcFRJOa tvzYFDBwSAsx+rtIoPTKmZ6QGJ5HgX/VJw5WKLnq7M6HluPOjo6+nHeRmKQBveRA2rHj WYK0mjtEAPZ5cGTLdtnW22UZ7xza9RQgPvb6eXegAOfj0tlh8dSm6VyJZX7Y7oecuKyn xn+HYr0jCDBWJYSu8PrYXdmHn6pH65iJZYM3dg7XOczQWlBArFiVA/5o2XHfRV6pYJNI v/IIRqLdhxSY9nJgw8Oj1iAfD9jOuTxMbzImqMJc8pfMOSBklUQJ3UXttGl18oGmRdAa 7KcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiPn6cm/ZBSTioo8OYzdUrTRMtSU10W8vI6QSzHsmkwpXpDuAeQ aTp/GcHLtTSj1jE45kJuirjZeQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62nPAPlGWB7raW8omVCcFsETxBrY3gDo3KOu3Zb9BXOM/dx7yHP1M1zCG0nsmt5PUm54cJgXg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:dac9:: with SMTP id r192-v6mr690207wmg.141.1538118632049; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:e0:148b:4fb5:8e21? ([2001:660:330f:a4:e0:148b:4fb5:8e21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4-v6sm5718775wrd.25.2018.09.28.00.10.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <1C8878A4-4130-4920-85D3-1F98250C94C5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:10:29 +0200
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-gpe@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D8743E5-F416-4373-975C-4704F95D7B79@gigix.net>
References: <153805631869.26309.11407581519814751945.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1C8878A4-4130-4920-85D3-1F98250C94C5@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/j-R2Bhh1llZnVSRYbuEGSiOmCxc>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 07:10:36 -0000

Hi,

> On 27 Sep 2018, at 18:53, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> This draft needs to update RFC6830 since it takes the last reserved bit away
>> from there. As a side question, since 6830 is being bised right now should this
>> flag be acknowledged in the bis draft?
> 
> The working group decided to not have 6830bis refer to LISP-GPE.

As I said during the IESG Telechat, my take is that 6830bis should not refer to GPE, that would be a circular dependency.

Let’s leave 6830bis as it is, with the last bit reserved. 

LISP-GPE will update 6830bis allocating the last bit.

Looks to me as a standard IETF procedure.

Ciao

L.
 



> 
> Dino
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email