Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for LISP-SEC (draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17.txt)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CBE1200E3; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 05:28:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0B_X2qDzOzQd; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 05:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F45512004D; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 05:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 47J3RJ6Vzyz2yKX; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:28:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.98]) by opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 47J3RJ5SXVz1xnn; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:28:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM7F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:28:12 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for LISP-SEC (draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHVn0zWM85C7D3uBE61qyORhwFP86eUDV1A
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:28:11 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313DB304@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <3EF5E431-BD4E-4775-B413-B4A4A6C4A887@gigix.net> <7017544C-A7F3-4F09-A8F3-220BBFC13B7A@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <7017544C-A7F3-4F09-A8F3-220BBFC13B7A@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313DB304OPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/jWl98Xny0gCIcdA1uBmLdpmIeZg>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for LISP-SEC (draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17.txt)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:28:16 -0000

Hi Luigi, all,

-19 looks good to me.

Fabio addressed my WGLC comments (https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17-rev%20Med.pdf).

Cheers,
Med

De : lisp [mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Luigi Iannone
Envoyé : mercredi 20 novembre 2019 03:47
À : lisp@ietf.org list
Cc : lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for LISP-SEC (draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17.txt)

All,

the LISP-Sec document has been in WG Last Call state for a long time.
This was due to the comments that have been provided.
We did not receive any further comment recently.

As such the this last call will be closed in one week time.

Please have a look for the latest changes.

Thanks

Ciao

L.





On 28 Jan 2019, at 21:29, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:

Hi All,

since work on bis documents is re-starting to move forward it is about time to move forward other pieces of the LISP ecosystem.

As such the LISP Security document has been revised a while ago for two reason:
- Make sure is PS quality
- Make sure it is compliant with latest changes in the bis documents.

The second point has been re-checked by the authors just last week, and seems we are ready to move the document forward.

This email open the usual two weeks Working Group Last Call, to end February 11th, 2019.

Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.

Thanks

Luigi & Joel