Re: [lisp] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with DISCUSS)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 18 February 2016 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153D21B29F3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:15:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPUYSsrpzzSu for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBB61B29F1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id g62so29834984wme.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:14:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ProHiT3fijsMCqTW4vtXKUMQX1V3fQyv/0CiCdO2G8M=; b=dZ+d9HZW6cwfDcDCusYhX5KuYYK9jinoRUmb4IiOwXn/qNW3Op1IFhXBnfkbfL3Kt2 bPQ7yxjoftjywhMhildRjq1U3n8opBWJ+JrAAm+9K6ALPmm92xwtwY2fcqzi03cjgvds 1TdesxVj+igvK7HppuHFFYFGvjZzvTJuCZ+W3n8R2hUpLaCj0Fsw4uO3RjLzYhxpTFe3 CshlXVV9VKPyYNBO0KNAEhY0qAyGAOM+QpjY43BsypwKE0SxFbhUwJeWtD2Eqf6l/sbo Z39WGJPEG8e6Py+QAc/lzAvZTEnUs5uL4mlJ3Ioe88HUXAXG2APeYTeJuwZxukjpWMSy 9cSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=ProHiT3fijsMCqTW4vtXKUMQX1V3fQyv/0CiCdO2G8M=; b=KwmeBxYQlKzV9s6pyb6joYd3DgWFBZWtHKC71gIZTSWdc0EZWJGBuG4/nrsiAELV2/ 4kPN0An63XWu6j2v39gVdXcVoTHghAjvf6uUPcC3K3hPWQq0j1sw0+2Hf6VNs0dV70TN +qddfvNFqRi4L80v8ipa6REh6vH4MOs5f+eHWZ6HwD391+4YtZ8Q1B+Knphdv+cYYpcF LqKmsCPFAgHLa6cYAe9iX2lydLzrc2xCnXz9h6Zz2uStu2HfRk0uH2GdpNvTFgwKULKc v6tFQDCjqD2vXkc3dJ3giHiYSuLNsJ4q5SFLycm79E6fraC6scXOwCo7l81AeHboZZkp TAFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQfc+vq2YE6YiRHMAEx/yBhqNOMtjszJr4MzXcKnYMrQy4QPgvN90WcX1N5V5snDQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.148.130 with SMTP id w124mr3996909wmd.71.1455808496043; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fatboy.ciscolive.local ([195.243.240.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c7sm3419703wmd.13.2016.02.18.07.14.53 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:14:54 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <56C5C040.6090100@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:14:52 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED6DF41D-82F6-4035-BD0E-0B70A5A9E7C7@gigix.net>
References: <20160218000429.12257.2783.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8EB22CA3-9933-4193-84E1-BC4AAA4D1F62@gigix.net> <56C5C040.6090100@innovationslab.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/jYhodVtktaK0xYXmoAjbnhTaZpo>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:15:00 -0000

OK,

thanks Brian.

Just to learn how the process is, why there was a previous mail saying everything was fine?

thanks 

L.


> On 18 Feb 2016, at 13:59, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Luigi,
>     To clarify... We got a request from IANA to hold the document since
> they "still need to double-check the IANA Considerations internally for
> this document."
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> On 2/17/16 7:26 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>> HI Terry,
>> 
>> would be possible to have more information?
>> 
>> The latest email from IANA, dated 2nd February said:
>> 
>>> (BEGIN IANA COMMENTS)
>>> 
>>> IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:
>>> 
>>> IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. 
>>> 
>>> IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which IANA must complete.
>>> 
>>> IANA understands that there is an operational requirement for an EID registration service that ensures uniqueness of EIDs according to the requirements described in Section 5 of the current document. Furthermore, there is an operational requirement for EID registration service that allows a lookup of the contact information of the entity that registered the EID.
>>> 
>>> IANA further understands that RIPE NCC has agreed to run both the registration service documented in this draft for the duration of the experiment.
>>> 
>>> IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document.
>>> 
>>> Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed.  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Sabrina Tanamal
>>> IANA Specialist
>>> ICANN
>>> 
>>> (END IANA COMMENTS)
>>> 
>> 
>> There is no question section in that mail.
>> 
>> Anything I am missing?
>> 
>> thanks 
>> 
>> Luigi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:04, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: Discuss
>>> 
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> DISCUSS:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> This is a DISCUSS on behalf of the IANA who are questioning the clarity
>>> of text and construction of the EID registry service.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>