Re: [lisp] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-06: (with DISCUSS)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 28 September 2018 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDA4130DF1 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LyE2RahkaIL2 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B059130E36 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id z14-v6so5123823wrs.10 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=X8IL0FjZcMjSHVYn+UUMDlAEgDlODShceFjK8dp08lA=; b=eNxVJPPQlgdIbDYsUaRVvpnmfv91w29QN4/Y481BNXrRne/a9hrYZGna5LuHRaTPqA JmvJHVkAlS6lH+Yl+peapUq91B38fyVrlVZlEXGx+oLk6ACYbah23VZsFJj5akShx9dv 6ACQQl7YxTMkp9PeGbnmYVsHg6eE312VacncTvNOHgdJW+MjYUd5GYFe13udNcsHgwO9 eW3PJy069PDoFfb+9o/Kfk27z+Q4EtMpZY1B4kensUzqYBf85DTY3O5l+GaaZ34+B8mr MkDDzUk9t6G83+d0XaTHrC4+PjWjyN3d8xDz7nPG+SrgZSai8RJsjAVI95QEjgsemVFH b1Cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=X8IL0FjZcMjSHVYn+UUMDlAEgDlODShceFjK8dp08lA=; b=GKb8ZyWGBPn/SLkoxmPSfG9i0WTNsnqV7PaXl0s2Sv56pEcSRK5Fw0E6gfJ0seUgLz xgEEaiXfL2I9YyRAs1XbFo3mOe1m4KXt/fvQpKpFwMxQKU/ckONWu4/qCr5OfoYy+TiE 7T4vFCFMSJUYtANy38fX9OJgjixgM+QEL8WbrISt8GggNmCrFcPebJRdW+IeWzOaQyiS Ph6d1WNo0XlvKFgLbFdbYLWSEkskS92zeJCeCae6OKkWse+sAkPTudL6R95SqfJ5VZmA +Mv4I7baEVtqZURUQq7+u/UpegkzH4B/JluAMzJcoIbHv2D3CeCN9mvKNHiPK5yd3wnr oGsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoheGoQDooaJWziNH1cHRlbWLAgvtrE9zEuKv9RmwJi+YGAw9SiJ PnTyjqTfv1NshfIoB4IpzU98hg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62TbkIfOWx7GfiqlrqTgXekbeaMtAIBlIdc7h58Owb5f2Xhtf+/fMWeyP4PNXvi4+EkzrpZ1Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:400d:: with SMTP id n13-v6mr10556928wrp.147.1538118448368; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:e0:148b:4fb5:8e21? ([2001:660:330f:a4:e0:148b:4fb5:8e21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e16-v6sm2948542wrw.17.2018.09.28.00.07.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <153805487385.26290.14227373548139794294.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:07:25 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-gpe@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F547DE0E-BB6B-4488-B85B-B21129942BDC@gigix.net>
References: <153805487385.26290.14227373548139794294.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/kK1e4jwiQ1Pb1nPaWifj-LLCoFk>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-06: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 07:07:32 -0000

Hi Alissa,

> On 27 Sep 2018, at 15:27, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In the thread with the Gen-ART reviewer, the rationale that was given for
> advancing this document now even though rfc6834bis is nascent was:
> 
> "We do not expect big changes in any bis document, since they are just the PS
> version of deployed technology."
> 

That was my comment. I surely wasn’t expecting so many comments on the bis documents.

I agree, with your position. 

Let’s solve the current comments on the document and then put it on hold a bit, while solving the comments on the other documents.

Ciao

L.