IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] [DMM] Mapping System scalability

Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com> Sat, 17 March 2018 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BFC12778E; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 05:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5HZpzjEWoJxg; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 05:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F461270A3; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 05:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1B0EAFE8C990B; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:04:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from YYZEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.218.33.71) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:04:53 +0000
Received: from YYZEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.54]) by YYZEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:04:44 -0400
From: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] Mapping System scalability
Thread-Index: AQHTvP+wS3SkfmMY802l3J9Iog1YwKPUVK2w
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:04:44 +0000
Message-ID: <D57109449177B54F8B9C093953AC5BCD74B4D53F@YYZEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YHcKFj+T_DS4TQZZf+=ccYYbd_yGrQ5pcezovD_4keKMtMJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YHcKFj+T_DS4TQZZf+=ccYYbd_yGrQ5pcezovD_4keKMtMJA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.124.182.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D57109449177B54F8B9C093953AC5BCD74B4D53FYYZEML702CHMchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/l-Ya-cHKUnGnamxIyXSYp8pYpfU>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [DMM] Mapping System scalability
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:04:59 -0000

Alberto,

Our tests showed  very promising results for public cloud Pub/Sub (DHT based). We got about 120ms performance out of these systems.
Given that these systems are designed to mover large chunk of data, it is very reasonable to assume that the performance for these DHT based mapping systems can be further improved for 5G.

Arashmid

From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:20 AM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Cc: lisp@ietf.org list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: [DMM] Mapping System scalability

Hi all,

In the DMM call this week, some people asked about the scalability of the Mapping System. The LISP community has delivered different solutions to address that challenge over the years. Here are some pointers to different Mapping System implementations, I'm sure that the folks at the LISP WG list can provide even more references.

LISP Delegated Database Tree (LISP DDT) [1] follows a DNS-like structure and it's designed to be deployed at Internet scale. For an academic work on a DNS-based Mapping System take a look at [2].

Designs leveraging DHTs have also been considered to enable high scalabilty, see for instance [3][4]. For a survey on different Mapping System options see [5] (I wasn't able to find an open version of this article unfortunately).

For those interested in current research efforts, recent works include decentralized designs [6] or even Blockchain-based approaches [7].

Hope this helps,
Alberto

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8111
[2] http://people.ac.upc.edu/ljakab/2010-jakab-jsac-lisp-tree.pdf
[3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-lisp-shdht-04
[4] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.139.735&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[5] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6422285/
[6] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-decent-00
[7] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/materials/slides-97-lisp-blockchain-based-mapping-system/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email