IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS)

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Thu, 27 September 2018 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02A0128D68; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OaY0Esfx28Lu; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670095.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2374127333; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZZw9G1tpzKCBo2IiuVBNbSEaBOYxYFo6cb+SS/adlpk=; b=b9CoUU+4tuaob8xH7JSyXnKN4UZzf/o2B2Zxppf0HPJqNCUlUtR4OzdcSwZJigaD/UOejVqQ3WSuGx3f80jEm+HfMLpocgsAvGz+YpZKQ2iwrePn4OIra2gvRKgzeh2OSSMeV/C8sJQfDNwTHCBQoWvELRJ26I1xYElUPHo0Ahw=
Received: from YQBPR01MB0226.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.169.141.148) by YQBPR01MB0035.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.169.140.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1164.22; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:08:32 +0000
Received: from YQBPR01MB0226.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::8dbd:5e3f:40e5:d4e1]) by YQBPR01MB0226.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::8dbd:5e3f:40e5:d4e1%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1164.024; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:08:32 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
CC: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHUVodcrt/Len8EHke6SI6hdj1mQaUEjqsA
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:08:32 +0000
Message-ID: <730DA5AE-2183-49F6-86B1-74D8D03BF402@kaloom.com>
References: <153802608641.21525.4981689568836441403.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7FD9C027-C60B-4552-A1CF-B98D490CDC53@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7FD9C027-C60B-4552-A1CF-B98D490CDC53@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Suresh@kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [45.19.110.76]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; YQBPR01MB0035; 6:/NmOycXptrH6+HDmkGoalTYwk8a+xDPZKRR7HL4SO2XoYI4FKvsSb8pQCv17CXHOjQcxxOZ+V9QbkGsEOThUH+kYru7U+M3aiQ5FcywF86Enc+cLGMRntv0T1fkIcr+BJDITSSJTeOxK75dT8ca9sov1bVVhU62Mop+gb+m2XlvPiVyf8KRTiXy93nK1dNUGsjIJ3tGS4yD7VIxHSq5ufsgh+E/W3DewqkbWi9fAOttLbSY0ytslZtDPd+j5eMtg/t/hb8U1UwWVBgW3fmPj/+PXDAA9+92O8Ph5+S293VHRQq2sjBe7EjXHeLP0yibCZSD3AWl5w/YBYgVRhFogLsrX6uvZeeKQRqT3xZUfyfYQ//i1mDvKkQVIDjKr1uzLPShCWNwKfzaCioYjuO+jAloyXJIUlqXqlixvIAwAM2mcbpV/WmgQKxSyheRIdqUAuwaWflGQAa9LtJ06rij1eg==; 5:kuAz0CUtNCJVe8YW8mFeqOUpKkKUn7rYsJGXoSjPnAjFsk7+JBJHqnGDTZFecFOQkxQz6RvPNW8c70aMttxCiAylBTQM+hPiHewWiJXHKHR1g4zCPDvOc+gCm3ErihkJzk2f0lmNvmJeTre3qeQWfhI9iqwReST7kQj+1a7AI68=; 7:f7yvhbM2wj5lHQwFKk917NSvlWbWRVeKZEr6s8Zamum/LAiMogXRy6x74C78n0wlYp5leXiWdOiKCjuc9etsxwUlgtCzuAnPfIwH/oSEFg6+ikOxDTyPBKHKnzQJK1hn97fev8VzA2UpSLtx4EtsK4PsnoMU8iZD+7eTlvp3tACNmLR2eyS940MexMkScPOaxeTwJz7FVuzebeO6gf7ClnHFFe++HoEqTRrJb0ZnAgdDKnKdIWD0TiAOJ8MJdEI9
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3646df55-2b3f-4c8e-df7c-08d624b4fff4
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(7021125)(8989299)(4534165)(7022125)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:YQBPR01MB0035;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YQBPR01MB0035:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <YQBPR01MB0035F0B5CAA9AD2E1CD1C7A6B4140@YQBPR01MB0035.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(85827821059158);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231355)(944501410)(52105095)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(2016111802025)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(6043046)(201708071742011)(7699051); SRVR:YQBPR01MB0035; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:YQBPR01MB0035;
x-forefront-prvs: 0808323E97
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(136003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(39840400004)(199004)(189003)(229853002)(68736007)(53936002)(25786009)(6486002)(7736002)(54906003)(305945005)(486006)(106356001)(71190400001)(34290500001)(71200400001)(316002)(6512007)(82746002)(86362001)(256004)(4326008)(6246003)(83716004)(1411001)(3846002)(6116002)(2906002)(33656002)(14454004)(6506007)(39060400002)(81166006)(5660300001)(2900100001)(8676002)(26005)(186003)(97736004)(66066001)(102836004)(76176011)(5250100002)(6916009)(105586002)(53546011)(8936002)(36756003)(80792005)(81156014)(508600001)(476003)(446003)(6436002)(72206003)(99286004)(11346002)(2616005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:YQBPR01MB0035; H:YQBPR01MB0226.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kaloom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: FkgnVJKc6/sT0YHrjGeQlGtHWbUABraG1WsUgC2kdOrZwuSBXg1dZR8naKJ4qdf0xXJ7mHnfREkiJQhWGlXL0zmggkx/wcBgkUdGBYuA0iWV6jM+a4oysA5DjrK82Tk+pdrZrSC1pIuFgeOQgsjOptKy1uqDtRP6p1mTRkk0WsWRyJG/o43Q0poZKB0m3obkjNcO27Ti7BdgQpO/QRLRIJFp5k9SYgNwPLTbpzybkXk06tXw0RSJh7JQ6E7qkCkmOvtEwUiR7LNR1zgSpTHwwRvvGjRSQOrFcVwXsL/kSi5e9wZx1ltS6PTpfpzOO+pa5mIwWTu+uSR34lILcM52xjLdKjRNxuZsnxXDjOY9m8k=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <CD0403B7A6E87449B54500430627E859@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3646df55-2b3f-4c8e-df7c-08d624b4fff4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Sep 2018 20:08:32.5830 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YQBPR01MB0035
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/lH3xP8MBvrb1JdZaEL_YRwM7NJQ>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 20:08:37 -0000


> On Sep 27, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This should be an easy fix but I would like to see it fixed before publication.
>> When talking about IPv6 packets being larger than L, the correct behavior
>> should be to send an ICMPv6 message with Type 2 (Packet Too Big) instead of the
>> Destination Unreachable (Type 1) message as specified in the text. The text *is
>> correct* for IPv4 messages with the DF bit set where the Destination
>> Unreachable (Type 3) is the right kind of message to send.
> 
> Consider this fixed in -21. We had this comment before and missed this one occurence. I will make it the same language to be consistent with section 7.2. Thanks.

Awesome Dino. Will clear as soon as -21 hits.

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email