Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 27 July 2017 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fcoras.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754A9132196; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUZ58uSZegIm; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x243.google.com (mail-pg0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA38F132192; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x243.google.com with SMTP id y129so21540075pgy.3; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ZmvZYkHbpmSdjAaonslUTAqJ/uMNECkfXtVcn7mrEkE=; b=WTVb1lBeYr8oB8dl7mjn6LRPXTzdsTHUbGgQwRJouFSj24ZqAnpImy65RZGOn0oon1 Siu8L5uQHVAIyfKUF6boeaFBJcWyyQWndoS5wAPbsetBtlyh9hV5a2XURloLM4RdVLHU gGgPo+yC9afyeLiVs9HRmnbQvgKa+5x0f38IxuQ+2G0pcMgivMIEODRqpvLyCw2hqrkN hgRU5zjwWA4iPfC8mXZfIJGXuuFshEl6rFRUyKY++kmnLiuEsJJ9z8BfkV7q5OSLbzjk M4ZUvhDcg4Pf3jHQJNJ69ysq+0YlYNvKhBca3y/EloL0vIsI6o1SM5vVtsuyW/eJBroS NHoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ZmvZYkHbpmSdjAaonslUTAqJ/uMNECkfXtVcn7mrEkE=; b=Q8nrhyBDSZwxlMSd2QZXBkRdqF+hKNS6LMCR+t95UW0q24wTq0O+Y/qH0E3wq7LmfJ hHgFuvfDSA4QdKZRn99CC0KyqoecraMHxGN6n7Z5HjxFKJEvBYDVhz410i+qO3vqV/Iv c8SCSeZ7hLebnH+tz966YRle/G44Mq/dyTjK7YOc1tpaOAN/Ba9rzpsBDZ6LJrffTu9G KQ3PyWgw9wFNAbWMMuoFgI9cStw/qdlrTkfmQJn0NNAtZc7+pEtX1LkE5cJCsJHC63Zh K7LZPPKgrWhwES4uubbkdQ65c/ikhLccNo2rG0lGIPMy6TEtENSK/5NIg7NOmgvX8t7L WLKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112z5YHymbU9PAcbSafzvZURYrKGMGVrKuaj5I5NGB9mtWovFXY3 pD/etQHLMW+0rlYVico=
X-Received: by 10.99.94.66 with SMTP id s63mr5349551pgb.253.1501187243613; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0c8:1006::43? ([2001:420:c0c8:1006::43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m18sm35060632pfe.126.2017.07.27.13.27.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <246AADDF-101D-458D-BA14-85C2257F3F27@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_936D9C23-9CA7-4AA2-B616-AE8B2239EF02"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/mBAsypqS4MQ-4NnDcQGPZE0eqJY>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:27:31 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document. 

Florin

> On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:41 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00>]
> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption.
> 
> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the meeting outcome. 
> The call ends on  August 3rd 2017.
> 
> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.
> 
> Recall that:
> 
> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to 
>   modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid.  
>   Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
> 
> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, 
>   and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can 
>   begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>                       
>                                                                                                         
> Luigi and Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp