[lisp] Terry Manderson's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-impact-04: (with COMMENT)

"Terry Manderson" <terry.manderson@icann.org> Tue, 20 October 2015 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCBE1A879A; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Terry Manderson" <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.6.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151020084725.10777.28272.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 01:47:25 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/n4F99nD2Y_TSc4AfvihT7OXMdi4>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-impact.all@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-impact@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: [lisp] Terry Manderson's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-impact-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:47:25 -0000

Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-impact-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for producing this document, and appreciate the honesty contained

I have two suggestions.

>From the introduction "The main goal of LISP is to make the routing
infrastructure.." please consider s/is/was/ given the tone of the rest of
the document and the discussions underway regarding the WG.

Section 2, second paragraph "Provider (interdomain) Aggregatable";  I
think "interdomain" is superfluous here.