[lisp] Re: IETF LISP Multicast Reviews
Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 11 November 2024 21:48 UTC
Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD1AC1D4CCD for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-8NbGyBK2JW for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FA9C1D4CCB for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e2d1858cdfso3744551a91.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731361729; x=1731966529; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=snJCAKD5O+qbTw5Xb2qTlpyNSREi9HKIt4Ir0p9oDdw=; b=de0soI9eFfBx82JbjgvPRQ1htX5iVhCdCqOTOPS2FpE9IAawM+T4HXkyZg8T3UIMpP 3hLqZZBoiEDPTe6Za6rTopGH95ZftdB+qvYod/profxTEE7RMnqJkv4X3PuCHPAtF53J jID7MU2n1iJcDsUP5nAYYrmKySyuP1U+aWtKUXK+/F7MTUEV4DLO9Wt3sDxlc0mocIWR PHg8IUdAzwjbCR8fDxmWbDvYLKjgrK2U4mFNZPNye6Rjki2MlGPJ5OhwYRJKHLBzYt5F mauuO8HJgN+sVhyBS8J0kWC/q+u6d4dtGIPiB3vNcRq63zKAhif3uDOSyooE1P0gVQFm IFDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731361729; x=1731966529; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=snJCAKD5O+qbTw5Xb2qTlpyNSREi9HKIt4Ir0p9oDdw=; b=QQXzeTHGmWMl6y1XnR/MwfD0nRyWCJn9qm78oD8c5CMO4D7ZKoHRWgJ1p1WWLFwkgh 3XDzBviscn2G5edl4ZMay4PtSH6Z6yhrkqt7+XMl/GbM8lC3agmRuYfBy6C+wbi9zUKQ 7gakBG+9GF274mbRnvhuHHMLlNvC+kCNhTCMn9iB8p2PKn/5F8bVmOYIcaSoYR3SZlBA DVaVjYDussnsArG+37zFtHmQAYzFGqd5dFGAcSVHMbsE3LWQciDRZE6EjsKvjBYQi99x C/GIG/Ri26cW2shk9IFKpCrBfiRaSwWarogVp5eqQCJZ2VtKMwA4AXGYxFtMZblIfkk4 aD3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzEK5bmoNFHrqIbe3owiePAGNfTzoOgFa0icDhHlYYcxQlWugfg Q9UmxYl5CbzQD31Xy3PFcEIHH1ZRxGQAPLDFTrdgMCQ6CmSOrkan8zFcLQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJv2iktEUfTOI+LxG0RqCChAEyDK5TkrWwBgNUsKDXUZoj7sTeLmxNEktK99UeyofLRgvedw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1a92:b0:2e2:c15f:1ffd with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e9b171f18amr18414964a91.14.1731361729036; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-5-184-219.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.184.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e9a5f5fa84sm10248195a91.18.2024.11.11.13.48.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3818.100.11.1.3\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB84895A29F140AF4912BDAF6ECB4B2@SA1PR11MB8489.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:48:36 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A769B7A-1E05-422C-AE85-54621BDA5D2D@gmail.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB3591557AA8FE6701EB05488BB64D2@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR11MB84895A29F140AF4912BDAF6ECB4B2@SA1PR11MB8489.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Raphael Lienard (rlienard)" <rlienard=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3818.100.11.1.3)
Message-ID-Hash: CA2V6DAZOWFWZDE6SDGESS5GVXSL7YFR
X-Message-ID-Hash: CA2V6DAZOWFWZDE6SDGESS5GVXSL7YFR
X-MailFrom: farinacci@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-lisp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lisp] Re: IETF LISP Multicast Reviews
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/n_WRZxS9OA-_i5ZNQmGApujNk_s>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lisp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lisp-leave@ietf.org>
I will fix today and submit a new drat. Thanks Raphael for your comments. Dino > On Nov 11, 2024, at 7:52 AM, Raphael Lienard (rlienard) <rlienard=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi Team, > I have been reviewing the draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00 as requested by Alberto and I didn’t find any conceptual issues for now. > I spotted a few typos : > 2. Introduction > 1. A 1:1 mapping of a an overlay multicast flow, either a (Source, Group) or (*, Group) to an underlay group. > 4. Source Site Procedures > The Source Site Procedures from [I-D.farinacci-lisp-rfc8378bis] are followed for overlay nodes and [I-D.farinacci-lisp-rfc6831bis] for non-overlay nodes. There are no modifications to these procedures other than the source multicast site -ITR should be capable of replicating to multiple G-RLOC and U-RLOC addresses from its map-cache. > 5. Hashed Based Underlay Group Selection > When an ETR receives an IGMP/MLD report it needs to decide which G-RLOC to underlay join to join in the underlay. > 7. Receiver Site Procedures > The Receiver Site Procedures from [I-D.farinacci-lisp-rfc8378bis] are followed. This draft adds an additional step to the procedure on how should to select the G-RLOC address for registration. > Best regards, > Raphael > From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal@cisco.com> > Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2024 at 23:38 > To: lisp-chairs@ietf.org <lisp-chairs@ietf.org> > Cc: Raphael Lienard (rlienard) <rlienard@cisco.com>, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) <mportole@cisco.com> > Subject: IETF LISP Multicast Reviews > Hi Luigi, Padma, > I spoke with Raphael and Marc, they both have multicast expertise and are willing to take a quick look at the multicast documents (below) > > draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis-00 > draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis-00 > draft-ietf-lisp-group-mapping-00 > Thanks a lot for the help here folks! Any preference on which draft to take a look at? > Thanks! > Alberto > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-leave@ietf.org
- [lisp] Re: IETF LISP Multicast Reviews Raphael Lienard (rlienard)
- [lisp] Re: IETF LISP Multicast Reviews Dino Farinacci