Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07

Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> Mon, 27 October 2014 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lori@lispmob.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE43B1ACD59 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04oL8sZG_u3z for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roura.ac.upc.es (roura.ac.upc.es [147.83.33.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4B81ACD36 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw-2.ac.upc.es (gw-2.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.8]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9RE93Un009600; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:09:04 +0100
Received: from [10.8.0.26] (gw-2-vpn-i.ac.upc.es [147.83.35.76]) by gw-2.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32504CA; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:09:01 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0933319B-D7C1-4568-9049-4949A182BD65"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org>
In-Reply-To: <6D803253-77B7-4126-8602-66E2C852E91F@gigix.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:08:56 +0200
Message-Id: <BAD45A38-4569-4C58-9DB9-78F5CC6DF96F@lispmob.org>
References: <6D803253-77B7-4126-8602-66E2C852E91F@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ng6rcRBlpk4qk09wX2i5M5tkDnM
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:09:19 -0000

Hi,

Well structured and written document, with the right balance between brevity and detail.

A few small nits, which can be fixed in a later update:
- The last paragraph of the introduction refers to the “LISP specifications” in plural and lists a single reference. I think it should read “LISP specification”.
- First paragraph of Section 3 s/inetrworking/interworking/ Same in Section 3.5
- I think someone already mentioned this in a previous review, I would replace dashes with parentheses when used like this: "typically -but not limited to- an IPv4 or IPv6 address”
- Right before Section 3.4.3.1 s/LISP-ALT and LISP+DDT/LISP+ALT and LISP-DDT/

-Lori

On Oct 25, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

> All,
> 
> A lot of work has been done lately on draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07 and the authors requested a work group last call.
> 
> This email starts a WG last call, to end November 14th, 2014.
> 
> You will find the document here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07
> 
> Please review this WG document.  Let the working group know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD, or if you see issues with it. 
> If you see issues, please be as specific as possible about the problems, and if possible suggest text to resolve them.
> 
> Joel & Luigi
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp