Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 22 December 2014 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2312F1A1A04 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:14:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMy65QWZxVg5 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailc2.tigertech.net (mailc2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678EB1A19F8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341C11BC0FCB for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:13:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (pool-70-106-135-121.clppva.east.verizon.net [70.106.135.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailc2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 669E61BC1040 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 07:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:12:54 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net> <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/oYj0_Ttlnd5KxGz1HRnXm57M370
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:14:00 -0000

To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices:
1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to 
address the milestone.
2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to 
address the milestone.
3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to 
do this.

If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted.
If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what 
"different" looks like.  Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date, 
but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us 
understand your opposition.
If you like (3), please explain.  That path seems likely to waste more 
time than producing a good document.  Particularly since we have what 
looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable.

Speak up, please.

Yours,
Joel

On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call
>   for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.
>
> There was actually very little reaction on this call.
>
> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another.
>
> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A
> description of the impacts of LISP”.
>
> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th
> January 2015).
>
> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document.
>
> Thanks
>
> Luigi & Joel
>
>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net
>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07
>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07]
>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
>> adoption.
>>
>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
>> meeting outcome.
>> The call ends on  December 19th 2014.
>>
>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of
>> approval or disapproval.
>>
>> Recall that:
>>
>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>> expected to
>>   modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
>> content is solid.
>>   Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
>> changes to its content.
>>
>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state
>> your reasons why,
>>   and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>>
>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues
>> and we can
>>   begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>> Luigi and Joel
>>
>>
>