[lisp] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-10: (with COMMENT)

[Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Rich Salz for his secdir review.

I agree with Rich's conclusions and would encourage the author to explain and
clarify that design choice (use of ASCII characters).  This would include
explaining how errors would be handled in the case of incorrect ASCII values
being used.

If the use of ASCII characters with no restrictions persists, then I encourage
an addition to the Security Considerations to discuss the consequences of
inappropriate ASCII choices.

I also agree that the use of 'Distinguished Name' is an unfortunate collision. 
Given that, perhaps a definition could be added to Section 2.