Re: [lisp] EID Block Drafts

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Wed, 23 October 2013 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE16611E8284 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfFTPIS8SmC2 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD9D11E8250 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EB246; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lItraYe0CJqV; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:25:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.20.1.191] (unknown [172.20.1.191]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 386413A; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:25:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <52682C91.20002@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:25:56 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <01043C9B-F0ED-4C1B-AC85-57ADCF7113C7@steffann.nl>
References: <52682C91.20002@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] EID Block Drafts
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:26:20 -0000

Hi,

> And blocks which are not for Internet advertisement are not apparently what you get from RIRs or even requests for PI space.

This is incorrect. It is perfectly fine to go to an RIR to get address space even if you choose not to announce/route it on the internet (for any value of 'internet').

Cheers,
Sander