Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Tue, 31 March 2015 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C5B1A8A3E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10DBzN7iDBwS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E42311A8991 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgra20 with SMTP id a20so13505099wgr.3 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=J3Vj+yHS14YoDLrB3Cv9SODFwOTiA/F/5C053uugQXw=; b=Pad23KU8XCY+dL3JucKtLkcJKEB/LwOiuizT8MybrNbcLMgCvglo1B2RDDZ6GkV7ma bXy/zybWcfQKj1FezXJhhuyx4nVTPFxOtKfy4jwSlNVtbK+kp8FNZrpS8MkQLZzv9tN2 4XR3aA0XvMhSXc85CzyNSRqsnu5ms/sQ+quwF/Zg+5MQeOB0WMGxCF6zuPy6qEBpHbQ7 mp/d3r+0UhT1RUrU6mNH4YXnBs2iIAmspY+Z70U+u3yR/2GJGMA7oqREtu37gpXrOHbx Ysz8CMi18lvk+WH4OavEdiRON+o1/G+gigxQ+j9sX6GhK9kXK+vVD47oeILfRmq1xbdS ExYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl1MTJTuXD3z+7tZlwGyWDYkvoDnfuD8NGnRQzFzqgf0FYQE4qxp0mM4fWbHUbYu3jLHLFz
X-Received: by 10.194.174.106 with SMTP id br10mr73167244wjc.21.1427796970198; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:2c8e:eb89:58c4:d450? ([2001:660:330f:a4:2c8e:eb89:58c4:d450]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gy9sm10312893wib.12.2015.03.31.03.16.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BFFB60A1-1EA8-4EE3-B733-D32741B146D9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <B339BFE7-7E19-4AAA-8B2C-276402024C74@gigix.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:16:09 +0200
Message-Id: <970C4554-20F8-4636-8143-B02B2EE81409@gigix.net>
References: <B339BFE7-7E19-4AAA-8B2C-276402024C74@gigix.net>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/rcyq75DhlBvm0oQGZEEMo9zgVFw>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-impact@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:16:14 -0000

Hi All,

the WG LC period for the impact document is now come to and end. 
While there was clear consensus in the room during the last meeting, the latest reviews from 
Ross and Ron raise reasonable points to be clarified before going further.

Hence, the authors will work with Ross and Ron to make a fair description of 
LISP’s impact, and clarifying the assumptions used by the cited research work.

ciao

Luigi 

> On 09 Mar 2015, at 15:22, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> the authors of the LISP Impact document  [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01>] requested the Work Group Last Call.
> 
> This email starts a WG Last Call, to end March 30th, 2015.
> Because usually the pre-meeting period is already overloaded, the LC duration is set to three weeks.
> 
> Please review this updated WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> Any raised issue will be discussed during the WG meeting in Dallas.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel
>