Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension.
jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Wed, 21 August 2013 16:09 UTC
Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8E111E8104 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.181
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.181 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.419, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5992+c5CdoNt for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628911E8100 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 08D6E18C188; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20130821160937.08D6E18C188@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:09:37 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension.
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:09:43 -0000
> From: Nick Thomas <nick@lupine.me.uk> > Rather than me adding "proper L/ISP protocol semantics" to hide-eid, is > there a software implementation that I could work top of instead? > "L/ISP software" is not the most unambiguous search term in the world :) Quick answer to this part of your post: According to: http://www.lisp4.net/ there are two major open source implementations: http://www.openlisp.org/ http://lispmob.org/ (although I think the former isn't really being maintained any more). Noel
- Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension. Nick Thomas
- Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension. Nick
- Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension. Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension. Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension. Stephen Farrell
- Re: [lisp] RFC 6830 - possible extension. Joel M. Halpern