Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8f186ad4-3804-036a-6ff2-8bfd1fd86809@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:39:09 -0800
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>,
 "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D771A9A0-A9BC-4E9B-84F1-F81CC42CE86B@gmail.com>
References: <B249D16F-6B18-4311-BCF8-A0C270D462D1@gmail.com>
 <2a1f8a88-eed5-a433-9d53-ae9c8483bf6c@joelhalpern.com>
 <9FA74C96-C079-42A5-B56C-B7718647CF5C@gmail.com>
 <8f186ad4-3804-036a-6ff2-8bfd1fd86809@joelhalpern.com>
To: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/sZydT_dyaB7SfigChzG06Vpt-es>
Subject: Re: [lisp] RFC 8112
Precedence: list

It doesn=E2=80=99t make sense. As far as I can tell, RIG went through =
the same subittal and review process. I certainly believe it was a =
product of the working group.

Can you tell me why it didn=E2=80=99t go through IETF last call?

Dino

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Joel Halpern Direct =
<jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>=20
> No, I do not think it is appropriate to put it in the list (not sure =
if I can).
>=20
> LIG was produced as an Informational RFC by the LISP working group.  =
it is a WG product.
>=20
> RFC 8112 was NOT produced by the LISP working group.  It had been on =
our plate, and then was taken for publication to the Independent Stream. =
Which is fine.  (Luigi and I were asked if this was a problem.)  But =
that means it was not a working group product, did not go through IETF =
last call, and was not approved by the IESG.  Formally, it is a product =
of the listed authors.
>=20
> Yours,
> Joel
>=20
> On 2/23/18 1:11 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> I don=E2=80=99t understand why its different than lig. Can you put it =
in the list?
>> Dino
>>> On Feb 23, 2018, at 9:55 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> It is not listed because it is not a working group product.  It is =
an Independent Stream document from the authors.  (I agree it is a =
useful document, but that is not whta that list is about.)
>>>=20
>>> Yours,
>>> Joel
>>>=20
>>> On 2/23/18 12:34 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>> Chairs, can you check why RFC 8112 is not listed in the RFC list in =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lisp/documents/?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dino
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp