[lisp] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 19 September 2018 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B993F1252B7; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, ggx@gigix.net, lisp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.84.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153738612868.21424.5753365080841918983.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:42:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/skvjelRzlZ2CmmMEr6oNRNQ9Xtk>
Subject: [lisp] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Discuss_on_draft-ietf-?= =?utf-8?q?lisp-gpe-05=3A_=28with_DISCUSS_and_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 19:42:09 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for addressing the TSV-ART review (and Magnus for doing the review)! I
assume that the proposed text will be incorporated in the next version. (Would
have been even better if those (larger) changes would have been added before
the doc was put on the telechat; please update as soon as possible so other AD
can review that text as well).

However, I think the text still needs to say more about HOW the PCP should be
mapped to DSCPs. RFC8325 doesn't provide guidelines but a mapping for 802.11.
Is the same mapping applicable here?

Also, I'm not an expert for that part, but I guess there also is further
guidance needed on HOW to map the VID...?


Given this doc uses the last reserved bit in the lisp header, I would really
like to see more discussion how the data plane lisp can still be extended. I
think the solution is straight-forward (define a shim layer for the extension
and announce this capability in the Map-Reply), however, spelling this out
seems to be appropriate for this doc.