Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-02
Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de> Wed, 08 October 2014 18:15 UTC
Return-Path: <marc@sniff.de>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8120A1ACDAA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOtCaElzb9rf for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from door.sniff.de (door.sniff.de [IPv6:2001:6f8:94f:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EA71A7033 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.sniff.de [127.0.0.1]) by door.sniff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770622AA0F; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:15:27 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:15:26 -0700
From: Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Roger Jorgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>, drc@virtualized.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-ID: <20141008111526504441.351ecc0f@sniff.de>
In-Reply-To: <543538A8.30405@joelhalpern.com>
References: <543538A8.30405@joelhalpern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.15
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/sq6YEykVomNSLW5OIG2RxKTRckU
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-02
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:15:44 -0000
Hello Joel, authors and lisp list, while I think the document is overall reasonably written it has one problem: it's bound to an proposed EID address block that has no guaranteed end of life. If this experiment would clearly terminate after 3+3 years then I would say it's good to go. It's not the way the RIRs have written their documents but I think that's okay for a experiment and a 6 year time frame. But the proposals allow the requested /32 EID block to be turned into something permanently. For a permanent EID block it's reasonable to assume the RIRs deal with the allocation/assignment work ([1]) and then the document would need more alignment with RIR policy documents. A simple example would be the language, "allocation" is used throughout while "assignment" is only mentioned in the Introduction. I checked both ARIN and RIPE and it's clearly defined there. It's also going too far in telling IANA to not have a regional policy. So in short (and in all honesty): not feeling comfortable with the document in the context of a potential permanent impact of the document. Regards, Marc [1]: if the proposal is to have finally an additional authority beside the RIRs for address allocation then I would reject the proposal. On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:14:16 -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > All, > > The work on the draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-02 seems done and the > authors requested a work group last call. > > This email starts a 14 day WG last call, to end CoB PDT October 22, 2014. > > You will find the document here: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-02.txt > > Please review this WG document. Let the working group know if you agree > that it is ready for handing to the AD, or if you see issues with it. If > you see issues, please be as specific as possible about the problems, and > if possible suggest text to resolve them. > > Yours, > Joel > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
- [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Terry Manderson
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Brian Haberman
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… David Conrad
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Geoff Huston
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-bl… Luigi Iannone