From: "Chad Hintz (chahintz)" <chahintz@cisco.com>
To: "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com>, Dino Farinacci
 <farinacci@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG
 Adoption
Thread-Index: AQHQHgeHcvufsRbznkOTMZ1eTwYLspycRhuA//+zPYA=
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:08:45 +0000
Message-ID: <D0BDC84A.66C94%chahintz@cisco.com>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net>
 <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net>
 <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
 <13346F57-8C24-4455-8501-EEE7DFD86AFB@gmail.com>
 <BEE5EEF1-600C-4836-AD9C-BD552D2274C6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEE5EEF1-600C-4836-AD9C-BD552D2274C6@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <1CCE5E5D60D61B4DAD286E648064A2FC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/t1_EYMeSeKffuZkddlDkmmpj8jg
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG
 Adoption
Precedence: list

Agree with Victor and Dino.

Chad Hintz
Technical Solutions Architect
Commercial East Area

Cisco Systems, Inc.

United States
Cisco.com
Phone: +1-716-446-5312
chahintz@cisco.com
CCIE - 15729	=20

Twitter:@chadh0517Blog:dcnextgen.blogspot.com


"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"
-Leonardo da Vinci=20
<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/l/leonardo_da_vinci.html>







On 12/22/14, 12:43 PM, "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com>
wrote:

>+ 1
>
>Victor
>
>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>=20
>> I like option (1) and think the document should be adopted.
>>=20
>> Dino
>>=20
>>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>=20
>>> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices:
>>> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action
>>>to address the milestone.
>>> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to
>>>address the milestone.
>>> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to
>>>do this.
>>>=20
>>> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted.
>>> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what
>>>"different" looks like.  Best if you offer to provide a draft by a
>>>date, but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would
>>>help us understand your opposition.
>>> If you like (3), please explain.  That path seems likely to waste more
>>>time than producing a good document.  Particularly since we have what
>>>looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable.
>>>=20
>>> Speak up, please.
>>>=20
>>> Yours,
>>> Joel
>>>=20
>>>> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>=20
>>>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call
>>>> for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.
>>>>=20
>>>> There was actually very little reaction on this call.
>>>>=20
>>>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another.
>>>>=20
>>>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A
>>>> description of the impacts of LISP=B2.
>>>>=20
>>>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th
>>>> January 2015).
>>>>=20
>>>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks
>>>>=20
>>>> Luigi & Joel
>>>>=20
>>>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net
>>>>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07
>>>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07]
>>>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
>>>>> adoption.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
>>>>> meeting outcome.
>>>>> The call ends on  December 19th 2014.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of
>>>>> approval or disapproval.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Recall that:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>>>>> expected to
>>>>> modify the document=B9s content until there is WG consensus that the
>>>>> content is solid.
>>>>> Therefore, please don=B9t oppose adoption just because you want to se=
e
>>>>> changes to its content.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state
>>>>> your reasons why,
>>>>> and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those
>>>>>issues
>>>>> and we can
>>>>> begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>>>>> Luigi and Joel
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
>_______________________________________________
>lisp mailing list
>lisp@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp