Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Tue, 16 February 2016 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D4B1A0423; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:51:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0AtRlV2b7TVx; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5FED1A1B23; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id x4so91660841lbm.0; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:51:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5AKJzMzBMe2xIqZIQoe0npYXoY1IkJi/Scf/Y3+gBsw=; b=DW8MA+a9Jm88p+arGn+grviTRIz4um2eQg0Yvko7vHrdgXemjnmeIy5zxS+rHEO9Wt 9NIxWKaVNI6uvsdrXezByNzkTqCR2f6KR/HPJWXe+z6HSIm8Hxl2oqPDBVspaCaqBcoC utwsH7RdTUAvRZxCzL0kg7r5f0OTLFo1l5VIgjCX78Hs6Tijh9Kn4SeHpjqdih3ydu93 pHwAsKrGk7KqXQLxEPR453/4356iD89wOO5s+Sioq8EsyvetaiEYlr8/yChwPQaihKd0 o9AMIy4Mpt+bWRrTJkX0F0ZHMm4JuROq4Qb01D3HQMussvjCAi1dfYcWwtUxA/kjdp3T Uxmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5AKJzMzBMe2xIqZIQoe0npYXoY1IkJi/Scf/Y3+gBsw=; b=RXeG0WJM1IkKXbV9Qj/HZSkHOk0Tj0dfeP2nxL2vFnSEC37vLlA5Vj8dLT/+z7LdpB m9OQW2mPQG2ZDYvL8tOowam0kznEks7i7PFEl4+6ZclIdRPri2i1CQDt0Qz5qFz8r8rn jm/76HS0e8t6Ge7B8FCWnKN0dw+8Eej/tCwoPK3hYdwe0nNpVYSsbMVrE+Zz3jar2mn+ uAFRgkNMcTm9XSx5rBdOMfFK4aGY9r2ydYsmBOYMpKGihJBagVldUJH8pF0k1FOWHFvf wRQaOTH04xFP4MRG9lfuB03G8QxKahDtQKhbyZzi7pE0Ne1KZwtkZhHuoXXvwT7PY+aE BE7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSqBPDkW4/Mz0n9zz43KoRHG46PCzG10FiFSAMG7YdROGa7h+g+oWeyPmHM+VgSyl5qpy788vTLGSftFQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.67.1 with SMTP id j1mr7368500lbt.103.1455612662330; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.205.203 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:51:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160215224202.25311.31160.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160215224202.25311.31160.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:51:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SHsAj00ngiS083bbPBF0ybRM-YiAd+CzXc_fMECUcfEtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_J=C3=B8rgensen?= <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/t2geFxunBWtKp7gd4hYxK2Yq_uQ>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:51:09 -0000

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
<snip>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This document describes a set of guidelines that will be used in an
> experiment.  Why is it not an Experimental document?  [I may have missed
> the discussion in the archive.]

That's a good question. This document is the management part extracted
from the other draft so it copied the status from the other document.
I guess the question is if both should change status to Experimental
or if they're fine as they are?


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In the request template, the dates should match the ones in
> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block: 2018 instead of 2017 and 2021 instead of 2020.

They've been edited at different times, and it is a 3year experiment
so the date will have to be adjusted in both document if they're
approved,  before they can be published.



Other document is draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block

-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj@gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger@jorgensen.no