Re: [lisp] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with COMMENT)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Tue, 16 February 2016 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122001B2EED for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:28:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 839E8kviDE5m for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647161B2EEC for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g62so184499991wme.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:28:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0Ze5gQj7wrfzApriN/tdGCwautyGwaTS8jrw/Rr2Eck=; b=SlJXTSSULn+wQJFaCKhuwTpf2fSof8gJx24OhyLRJoNBA2G45WwrVOMKmSePK3FjaA mgJopx1av5DAIaH/Ju5+zil8Tc+y8dZMqAJsoSkhawnbbGYQMG+YG+hUjJ6TO8O5ziwx tuhw0skVKUBZ7ifaeUDjxY6wkEzL01x0yT6ye5wAdW/+BAoZa9ItkCZupZ0SSU8gLkxR 9DvALfQ2cZLxj0I4D9nlK/5poBu3W7oM4KJMK1LrNpJkwyFQPVeqDEBlNd2qlKMK+aDG 5zH3IuwmsnOCNYKs24IYs7XOPSM3HoMgBtwHYf4WiBR1Fus5kN8tdBSu0ziAD+uNmV6Q +ydw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=0Ze5gQj7wrfzApriN/tdGCwautyGwaTS8jrw/Rr2Eck=; b=mygNgAxtkIeiCsFw8LCe+niOAjHdatg6agk4tGLgecnk4KFa1l+/ToDm2c4A5GkO1b gSwLAQF8Vu0d3MJUMzfxiHmD0I21wTL0ct1nVRfztm4+48uJuu23VXQGdy/DlK0/8zGW MoGxLw2XRGmAW5heULXr90d9VWCP5Tk18VKMtWrV1/aMd4osQGE4jE58XmtSgWzyNmib TCQ60egUm9KtcVrELl/EGatJr93iCkr7vJqJfvZ24vXGz0cvWYakw9HAP3JO08leCDRc gB3LBTwBI37knhmT9zXwVExh7Zk5xS7NaSFimC2aji0eOXbMN8zLKPS2I/Hi7+hr+XU6 Sj8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT1jjHX9dcG//GtAqCqlHFEYXZCt8sAnIgMpUF+QqTinEfZgcPU3Gec/gmGXBmR6g==
X-Received: by 10.28.32.147 with SMTP id g141mr17885840wmg.19.1455618485952; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:28:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2003:8:10:8500:1df9:ebef:5c5:4a5a? ([2003:8:10:8500:1df9:ebef:5c5:4a5a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm29483162wjz.24.2016.02.16.02.28.04 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160216042340.12332.23631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:28:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A73CD1C9-A90E-444A-A413-A19BD287BD41@gigix.net>
References: <20160216042340.12332.23631.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/tFXsMqEEsg9Br0A5qVBWNz04EWU>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:28:10 -0000

Yes…. badly worded.

The idea was that renewing the registration means that the requester continue using the prefix in the way described at first registration request.

Wa will rephrase the sentence.

ciao

L.

> On 16 Feb 2016, at 05:23, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I can't parse 
> 
>       The conditions of registration renewal should no different to the
>       conditions of registration.
> 
>