IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 13 March 2009 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE5428C207; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7w6lvxg9RIO; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2310828C1E2; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 145424245; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <49AFF574.6090805@piuha.net> <1368441D-65C6-40E6-82FA-964E193C826B@lilacglade.org> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105B0AB7D@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:47:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105B0AB7D@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> (Fred L. Templin's message of "Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:18:42 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslprglcqtu.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>, ipdir@ietf.org, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:47:29 -0000

Folks, it's my understanding that we have stumbled onto a long-running
terminology discussion within  the RRG.

I submit that we'll make faster progress if we focus on what we want
to convey, second on how to say it, and only when all other options
are exausted trying to get people to change terminology they have been
using for a while.

So, I'd like to ask people to refocus their discussion around what we
want to convey.


I'm hearing multiple people who want the charter to do a better job of
conveying what LISP identifiers are and of conveying what separation
is actually achieved.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email