IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-barkai-lisp-nexagon-10.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ED3120ADB for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eoY4chG6MkRm for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CF01200E6 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id x15so306433pgg.8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hMbjl9WxbpZHeAHcC+YZYhyml1KlZy88ypVmtsN63kg=; b=AOSUm8qvzbFQQEbemD/bAUyQpMdbjpu0BQ9M3OoyG/l2IfQExdnX6C261FujbxBq8r grQ4cRe4ZScGpazmXdV0ODgWudNC5WPUso0PY+tNlIuVVfKWZNmSLKAkw3NheIVep7hJ z+tEMvlrKlKSSUY59Wcl8wDuAo65HZqFCQot6asdSnrxTUpZrLzoFE5SOEjl/vusX1Ni jzBUYeZo5P7OYGO+PHlNCGyeB3zCKezYHhFhWsd4p3KhUHN7NAQifulVVNW+tT10jOnM 3a6jxKWOpJ2E1J88BV4ZvcW+BaxFhIZlNjd0DN5fv3ib2K9lp03FhIoGlTOJD9lE29SL QuMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hMbjl9WxbpZHeAHcC+YZYhyml1KlZy88ypVmtsN63kg=; b=RgPulTYzUkxMOwKsnYzfe2VgYzGJvjWliGHX5T/ILVTs3dkDSViPO4AR6+e6ha/zVN WMUlEBWM01QOQnilVbcGNCBcmpDrcbjQzGw105rMMSHTNpHyQ8+htaM1hBA/ssBDHqkT dzBWZwqmRxZKKXFkUH/UUnaLIPn+3WPIpigQHhYMl+DJ5u/v4EDWuGPdQeq3BnatYcNR fwcowxL+7Mx6ixjkQq/g0R29VICk0aO9wNCrUcnv55lYsiaSQr6AGIspC0DiKN4xU527 Q1TIY5QfsmUNyzz5L4demvG2vCGjwDUPGoVBmc8KPo9V8K9MclZ35okocDpwkTn9xSZS bzbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU6FyxcXw3+y79t3aePs6S1ABF4B6/XiL6ejE+z6DgdDOWG3GgR HR6Jo90ZqCLDZH1GprqQbUilqbO5GJQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwP648MmHNzNU9thE5zqtRozdEQbZTX4kc6xMPaA13bwoBOJ/PJ+yIwbZJ+4QloT3tvVbeLoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4347:: with SMTP id k7mr5221639pgq.343.1568830693183; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.97.50.64] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 127sm8480266pfy.56.2019.09.18.11.18.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d6358cfd-9c8f-3c27-28a5-d7ae20280ec8@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:18:11 -0700
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE82B5CD-B2AC-4590-9F6C-8543E30A68FF@gmail.com>
References: <156862357770.28196.6343819812576579929@ietfa.amsl.com> <d6358cfd-9c8f-3c27-28a5-d7ae20280ec8@joelhalpern.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/tleM8WKQRwas6flIbPj501-YmD4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-barkai-lisp-nexagon-10.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:18:16 -0000

I’m a side author on this document and more of a reviewer. But I’ll answer your questions on behalf of a WG member.

> Before I get more privacy feedback (if I do) I want to know
> 1) does the WG actually care about this?

I do. Because understanding in deep detail the use-cases, allows us to understand if LISP has the necessary protocol features.

> 2) Is it ready for more extensive review?

Yes.

> I realize we have not adopted this document.  Some of this feedback is to help the chairs judge what to do when the authors do ask for adoption.

We are at a point of the protocol’s life where working on use-cases allows more adoption. I am for making this a working group document (even though the authors have not formally requested).

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email