IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 14 February 2018 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E8F127444 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w92vAxDiltoP for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA296124234 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f6so1875657pgs.10 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xYous87K+5pBAD77/694A7gC9myp6SgYfUWbjRz30tk=; b=f/ylGDPIqpecskQpOXH9++FK/BFDbDc8piv+lWqu2yZ1pGD7Z2aj3zCR0K9/eYIiUe qK7SA93YrxY7z+c4kIkvrtqK50OWUc/+fhCqrv2dU+R93QOnFXde7J9sqG1845Fg158T EaHoNNmMiUwjjcZQY5SrI9hx65rhjyjClMKKG9Abyj8MBBO9fYlvTlCHeB0Yt2649raJ MIGd2BCxvq1iVXz36RZUU7QWJneFdlpYnp5JVZWcy7LysmWGdfYm1ZqOUBm5H7gn9D1e rvO36D/6QO3K5MWEyDpttPjPmo0PrkRDAri0/AE7W8OZle4mCzWD9RDTtLHYyx6rLt/A ApJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xYous87K+5pBAD77/694A7gC9myp6SgYfUWbjRz30tk=; b=HdXAFvq0gpQEzfazILIFQLYlsJpBg+OA4LYT8NnbCP5e6QXrOfAZfG+CtwzBdySgpu pXZBhWVOGDFqCnFdJvic2gprpWjjSlryZx89SmG1V0uS2FRRi/Id0Jer78Qr6gzdtmym gUFC8e1NDP93G0x/GdDg9TEJqbaZaWlzM4qIttSK6WtEza6wUzKjq2LcHYS2B/KPFAm7 xwo4FzxHnYbU5m++gqse1N1JGcDjxGsWl1vr2KuN1Tg/Jl0y7qoil4FICnWT9hN8OYif C13dhFN1S5AvwWdy7XsThjY6H1ZXSa1cDebq4MD1UQ3B7yoYHDotKOCSET8gwx706OOx TXww==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPA4LcG94vAkYjgZYhk+tq++K0wjE+71fPiZnnwRI8nbTCHKSLhB nvgUmfT2+R6qTYqjxFOTrotr0zRl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225DvDfi1kEPmECe0mNdo4Kw1KIr7kLTINgPGcn9Ku/uUNrC2G820fZ58Mv4KMHS9JihDsYwgw==
X-Received: by 10.99.120.139 with SMTP id t133mr3848699pgc.382.1518612295415; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.127.13.105] ([59.29.98.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 81sm18548869pfu.117.2018.02.14.04.44.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:54 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7663AB6-C79A-4FC8-BFFB-C07C6B51579C@gigix.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:44:50 -0800
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E92D258B-818B-407A-8868-40B94F04E741@gmail.com>
References: <151857002410.24686.9371029633009485934@ietfa.amsl.com> <9FCFB9C1-DA70-4D00-879C-6D3E5EB1EAF4@gmail.com> <E7663AB6-C79A-4FC8-BFFB-C07C6B51579C@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/txtO6X-JvOq4V66OJ2sQvSrY6gQ>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:44:58 -0000

Ack. Sure.

Dino

> On Feb 14, 2018, at 3:44 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino,
> 
> thanks for the update. 
> 
> While working for the -10 version can you please check again the normative references? 
> There are a bunch of RFCs that should move to informative.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
> 
>> On 14 Feb 2018, at 02:02, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Folks, I have been sitting on these changes for a while. It addresses most but not all the comments that have been sent to the list. Albert and I are working on the other changes and will send a -10 update as well as an update to the 6833bis draft.
>> 
>> Included in this email is a diff file of the changes that are in revision -09.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dino & Albert
>> 
>> <rfcdiff.html>
>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2018, at 5:00 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the IETF.
>>> 
>>>      Title           : The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
>>>      Authors         : Dino Farinacci
>>>                        Vince Fuller
>>>                        Dave Meyer
>>>                        Darrel Lewis
>>>                        Albert Cabellos
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 53
>>> 	Date            : 2018-02-13
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> This document describes the data-plane protocol for the Locator/ID
>>> Separation Protocol (LISP).  LISP defines two namespaces, End-point
>>> Identifiers (EIDs) that identify end-hosts and Routing Locators
>>> (RLOCs) that identify network attachment points.  With this, LISP
>>> effectively separates control from data, and allows routers to create
>>> overlay networks.  LISP-capable routers exchange encapsulated packets
>>> according to EID-to-RLOC mappings stored in a local map-cache.
>>> 
>>> LISP requires no change to either host protocol stacks or to underlay
>>> routers and offers Traffic Engineering, multihoming and mobility,
>>> among other features.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis/
>>> 
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status