Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07

Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Fri, 14 November 2014 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCB51A6F03 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:07:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0LNyJuyiZUS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0709.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::709]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430691A1B6E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.199.24) by CO2PR05MB634.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.199.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:07:13 +0000
Received: from CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.199.24]) by CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.199.24]) with mapi id 15.01.0016.006; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:07:13 +0000
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07
Thread-Index: AQHP8EvAvDzeTL3Ueke2PdEqcrMWNJxfrqkA
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:07:13 +0000
Message-ID: <1b7f4cc2835d4a7294100dcdea921eb1@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <6D803253-77B7-4126-8602-66E2C852E91F@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <6D803253-77B7-4126-8602-66E2C852E91F@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR05MB634;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR05MB634;
x-forefront-prvs: 03950F25EC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(199003)(164054003)(377454003)(189002)(66066001)(16236675004)(4396001)(15202345003)(97736003)(19580395003)(99286002)(19580405001)(108616004)(74316001)(99396003)(19617315012)(107046002)(120916001)(95666004)(105586002)(20776003)(64706001)(33646002)(18717965001)(101416001)(31966008)(19609705001)(50986999)(15975445006)(87936001)(19625215002)(230783001)(106356001)(76176999)(106116001)(76576001)(19300405004)(62966003)(92566001)(2656002)(77156002)(21056001)(40100003)(86362001)(46102003)(122556002)(54356999)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR05MB634; H:CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1b7f4cc2835d4a7294100dcdea921eb1CO2PR05MB636namprd05pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/uy2CpvO3q3VjJudngGARszsP-qg
Cc: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:07:43 -0000

This (both -07 and -08) is much improved from the previous versions.  I just have two questions regarding what is not there.

Previous versions of the LISP introduction had a section on "xTR Mapping Cache Performance". This section (in the older documents) was largely based on studies that made unrealistic assumptions about the granularity of the mapping table entries. Thus it seems reasonable to have dropped the section. However, with a cache based system, isn't cache performance in fact quite important? Is this something that would go into a different document, and if so which one?

Also, I didn't see a discussion of OAM. This also seems like something that is quite important. Is this again something that would go into a different document?

Thanks, Ross

From: lisp [mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Iannone
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 8:04 AM
To: LISP mailing list list
Cc: Damien Saucez
Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07

All,

A lot of work has been done lately on draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07 and the authors requested a work group last call.

This email starts a WG last call, to end November 14th, 2014.

You will find the document here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07

Please review this WG document.  Let the working group know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD, or if you see issues with it.
If you see issues, please be as specific as possible about the problems, and if possible suggest text to resolve them.

Joel & Luigi