Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> Thu, 17 August 2017 22:46 UTC
Return-Path: <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D9C1323AA; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZK3imIhmdtM6; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0D0132667; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id g131so80903369oic.3; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A2fOi+Oz2P3qJCpIzHN6WAydoN0ZJhT27qM9mYoFKRk=; b=ksfErqLpr5PfIBMUahAJSpLcnASI/RkYL418B6P1ck2fk1ltxMTCLj7upxiQq1ZpkM OyvivUvIJLf+K9DlGQPE2n8cSDxcw7yh0/GJ8VuCcXqqws8/H7af0h5VcQTXWAnV17tg PpX0kLD4eovZBXSXfAK7bAKveEEtL0c/sz/L/DhlVevWxH+cLLJv0UORdAtUnJaYEViX FXwrCGUtBKXF6LNDVEnCtMzHZ2jCSab77IXkYfV9uJkG1Pkz4e8T2/DaAbWXrIuw4X7M gG85FLHBUHpX07QzHhDhzgSh7iNzqtSA4hGvXQQZ+AQ13fow971G4kNsFw+3yFqSgzA+ mPSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A2fOi+Oz2P3qJCpIzHN6WAydoN0ZJhT27qM9mYoFKRk=; b=BIyO/Fq3objjboCIe8qYiCmC6tSFU1T0KrMaaS9o4XVhgSBYLMW9jghvRf1QYQIiff o/ryOHTUrdpmB7uafnZ6dpmi49RKDGh2mYCF4FRk8yGUsUlhyOKA8DVxs9HBdfrgUmvR m8bNIIw7d6etey8FCoNttKlyikoL696SVlbfgWL+Lfh+5wKs0Yz/ryryi46MiQBWIbju PK8hvCeOBhr5puxkIDMbBUf8j1+JTgsE8xrq0cgDP9zhhYFW7LtcQhsur2o0enCRJiHS NkXkvKNlExhlk2g9quA/tsc/3cWVcGlb1cMbgDEBnXi5yw7x2qu5bfNDZhwxmIDQ5PH6 UvoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gSxoZ9Pdi8wgWiDtO+yekMlqyUsWClD4vP0z4S+HhQyWIH1Sh5 kEMBvpC6pOCfaQ569PUzhS2r00jsmEcw
X-Received: by 10.202.92.130 with SMTP id q124mr8293467oib.294.1503009989583; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.99.129 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <60426B54-9947-47AF-B141-AB8D80EBD07D@gigix.net>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net> <60426B54-9947-47AF-B141-AB8D80EBD07D@gigix.net>
From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:46:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+YHcKEm=p_W1ojRK4O9H+5w1a8x+=B=cZSgPDqSZmM-DoakFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d4d7c85e8dc0556fac8b3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/vDN7xORMt1x029_I81F-B3sqF8s>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:46:33 -0000
Thanks Luigi, Joel. We have just submitted the new version. Alberto On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote: > Hi All, > > Call for adoption of document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt > is now over. > > Several email have been sent to the mailing list in support of adoption, > clearly confirming the consensus for adoption. > > Authors are invited to submit a new version of the document named: > draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt > > Thank you all for reacting to the call. > > Ciao > > Luigi & Joel > > > On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote: > > Hi All, > > During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal- > lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt > [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00] > asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on > adoption. > > This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the > meeting outcome. > The call ends on August 3rd 2017. > > Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or > disapproval. > > Recall that: > > - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is > expected to > modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the > content is solid. > Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see > changes to its content. > > - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your > reasons why, > and explain what it would take to address your concerns. > > - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and > we can > begin a dialog about how best to address them. > > > > Luigi and Joel > > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > >
- [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LC… Luigi Iannone
- [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Sp… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Vina Ermagan (vermagan)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Jordi Paillissé Vilanova
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Richard Li
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Florin Coras
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal