Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09.txt

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Wed, 14 February 2018 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982E3126CF6 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:44:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IEupcHkADrG2 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31ADD120047 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q11so10042187wre.8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:44:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wA0eEdSHVnSJCAYNJiVLTaxWYAUXehb0WWoIZE9NpYE=; b=ZmTRn8KjKx+ytBjphst5382E88bA4fZ+JLzIR6MaeJ39R8B88Cp8yANA5buf1m3F5Y aN/rxnyG6YE7Y1DNDEVrnDjOha+Xf8qwShDWEzALQB7XHEMQHKyo8CWieaohZxFGRAfD Qms1jBK4PgunK0MAjwTW+5vCOxuwnJ4vCEkLNbGFuY/lmiQtuqjJXlDREzEfq1fCAOTf rIxkK2vzpq9yDa9cyuTiYZIWx7J+X6if4Ak5kvkQJQDxSZQ4re+sKpZJpHw9+9cPLCru mJrGubsTmONR0IwH1+w/JrWQ9zTqHSNcHQxioyGTw6yjpA8zMOaSMBBMEyyklXTPC+An QmNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wA0eEdSHVnSJCAYNJiVLTaxWYAUXehb0WWoIZE9NpYE=; b=CBlfVjmYDzidofvNwpS/Cy+bEYUG+qmHMaXIkYlvMNouvkyr497f5mM7zWtj8v83hV SG0azytIn+yZ4m5u3JLG/fbNl0dcG3mmyqFcVXL+JPoBkWbUKI+kuFhKlIun4p14t4pr Q724kMMiOQlDmK/HThJ1WdrYEtZ3CPF32AEBXQVeC98HcUXG14GhePGA0uygwTnVAsdO cXq00M2uM4DdMffw9NntCHgepOrf4D0goAHNdXMqczV3w2/5D3fS9JlPp7fzBGY+q9EL rMxaNHp2UkbHV4HwrVwwy2v9RagA7roW6QMCcew3JPWrM2sgbWrcTtLZ2BrDdY6HTW77 662A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDPcC2emF8xcoTnPu3fSD8QZhUd4o+pZb9d1qLM7fhGCEcwLs5P x/BJbUwqYcw2ykx7E13ydGmtQw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2252ttKYwVdsaJQssVGI9RKSv37osfw3udbi8qZhORSiv1k9HH/6FEgAjbsU4gyp96BTJKEGIw==
X-Received: by 10.223.144.163 with SMTP id i32mr4496776wri.73.1518608690297; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:122:cb74:8632:5da0? ([2001:660:330f:a4:122:cb74:8632:5da0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 204sm11704709wmx.0.2018.02.14.03.44.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <9FCFB9C1-DA70-4D00-879C-6D3E5EB1EAF4@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:44:49 +0100
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7663AB6-C79A-4FC8-BFFB-C07C6B51579C@gigix.net>
References: <151857002410.24686.9371029633009485934@ietfa.amsl.com> <9FCFB9C1-DA70-4D00-879C-6D3E5EB1EAF4@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/vDtwxvsELxMMeHUm6sWy8y_A8JQ>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:44:54 -0000

Hi Dino,

thanks for the update. 

While working for the -10 version can you please check again the normative references? 
There are a bunch of RFCs that should move to informative.

Ciao

L.

> On 14 Feb 2018, at 02:02, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Folks, I have been sitting on these changes for a while. It addresses most but not all the comments that have been sent to the list. Albert and I are working on the other changes and will send a -10 update as well as an update to the 6833bis draft.
> 
> Included in this email is a diff file of the changes that are in revision -09.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dino & Albert
> 
> <rfcdiff.html>
> 
>> On Feb 13, 2018, at 5:00 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the IETF.
>> 
>>       Title           : The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
>>       Authors         : Dino Farinacci
>>                         Vince Fuller
>>                         Dave Meyer
>>                         Darrel Lewis
>>                         Albert Cabellos
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09.txt
>> 	Pages           : 53
>> 	Date            : 2018-02-13
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document describes the data-plane protocol for the Locator/ID
>>  Separation Protocol (LISP).  LISP defines two namespaces, End-point
>>  Identifiers (EIDs) that identify end-hosts and Routing Locators
>>  (RLOCs) that identify network attachment points.  With this, LISP
>>  effectively separates control from data, and allows routers to create
>>  overlay networks.  LISP-capable routers exchange encapsulated packets
>>  according to EID-to-RLOC mappings stored in a local map-cache.
>> 
>>  LISP requires no change to either host protocol stacks or to underlay
>>  routers and offers Traffic Engineering, multihoming and mobility,
>>  among other features.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis/
>> 
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-09
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp