IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Sun, 18 March 2018 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B240812EAA5 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7paTVg5p7Hqk for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25DA712D954 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f125so3582931wme.4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lkuFahYrXQ7RBSkvTf1H/tNpEpKbNJY0YojEhDCzSNI=; b=azKkG8/1Yfljv7X2n0VOuSywd9/wbF8meLsgtiChPjBfZYXRUYolubJra7+6YSYiW8 QT59KnjjLNmQMzHZTdFaq0Bn7VoxzYSnvsMI+4642Q8aQ4L/3aSMsgvMdOcCMf0paLgd jHeczuVtViC1JBVTFsIPD8v49dfKy3miaI/HH6lH0shQqaxNrF7BInH0TUxzfHQ9VRkD Y6UlzS2aZlEebYRLNHHOJvUVeHGuFqTqGXQbIqEhPOIxWC60Jrq3qJ31h6SM93c9VCFr tRBAujgI9jQMIlFM8qC3toFqpb6TcrykChbAfFrZQvsSKem3dflc+wDhDx6IOry88hNQ 2YJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lkuFahYrXQ7RBSkvTf1H/tNpEpKbNJY0YojEhDCzSNI=; b=Q50QMd+d39A6dpyVmMq6SeDPUkBPJfbFPDxFPIyoaoetHZYAVAVgD98XT4rcyqi4iw ajin3Zz+saDmE0igx7skMTTgFV/PhSFMvu5Ng3AWvVhbnm2sPf4hyiNRy+Pfjh5M969f G6EBSnJRRHevA76DLDH3dkj6hseSOs7Vt5CMQ1azx3MiZfkH2Vkl/VjJUI3I0EX4ozsA qPTuii+nKDr8S1VdUGfdCrBYOtrgRNKc4c7RSsrHU974CkaJCUzfK7CsVKAyO1yUL0fJ vKDdJd1Yfyjd7pA2CBf+aD5LiC2U1LJBBucwA0JeIbyKgev6LQ3qVNVWul6OkQDP90Bl 0oZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7ETCVgI5BZVsbUurQ2+rEwqQDLP3YpSUf73KawPxcO7Hs2OovNf nbk1BeIvxn/zYd7ibPDShXF5LNlt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuqFjcpnQVJHX8E3AefJkv9Lla05DacUewHjlsbBfgMvnpOejHhVTN4RWjk/eQziZO41puGJw==
X-Received: by 10.28.71.67 with SMTP id u64mr7317331wma.76.1521407264523; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:754c:10c2:142d:113? ([2001:67c:1232:144:754c:10c2:142d:113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u20sm11613638wru.94.2018.03.18.14.07.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Mar 2018 14:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100)
In-Reply-To: <918956dc-e9e2-1150-5df1-d5b7b121e964@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:07:43 +0000
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BF9DF9F0-C57A-44AE-B0BD-44991324A719@gmail.com>
References: <B6E99388-F4B4-4980-B1F7-3351B4889AB4@gigix.net> <7E37C3CA-3D38-40DC-9162-D2477F8B8412@gmail.com> <05052a56-f6fd-b218-3a06-c516b01a08a8@joelhalpern.com> <93CBA389-8182-436A-9946-D5BD8C9F721C@gmail.com> <7205ee6c-f8a0-b1ce-5d33-8957cbc5a841@joelhalpern.com> <98134359-C621-4F4E-A476-AFA5CA016C24@gmail.com> <918956dc-e9e2-1150-5df1-d5b7b121e964@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/vLrBIFCYruuwmBVZR8us0Hi-kFw>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:08:08 -0000

> 
> What Luigi had suggested was:
>  Documents that request for a new LISP packet type MAY indicate
>  a preferred value.
> 
> That fix works for me.  Leaving it saying something about section 10.4 is incorrect.

This is in the latest revision. Thanks. 

Dino

v2.12.3 | Report a Bug | By Email