IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Proposing "Encapsulation Format" LCAF type

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B891A0470 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:16:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkwNXjRuHtan for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:16:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338731A040B for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:16:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a1so65379wgh.7 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:16:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DcbcpOdyvxvErEaszXHojN0FUVv3Wga2knVEAkgwSZc=; b=U6BcSLdlpqt4RK2yofKXDxL2Jbp/uDOiqbjL2kLPKZlNv8JlQFk0ci7NmYqfsWC3e5 /dYT5SeHitImAQyqRdEYGlmhtdeeUM8bZJ/uGhYZ3UGEx6Uah/WH2Hep3JXn8MypLiu9 o5IeYsKz/2HhFJHPtQ8hD2+mJ+F3Yad1qtgHHv+p7eebh2gDL00crZYGhl1pxEfBzDdC 5V5yIjaIfUlOf0F19+tHAcwgMt9GbDa/vwjmXI5K6DsfJTYuDXDPZouyLgavT9XRRzhV +8Q9VSi8afm6Z7NLridW4L3/2G2WTXdBnI5qFc3c4UVKsK0rMZo/TG5xa3GLojUx/+gA ltVQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.36.170 with SMTP id r10mr2987463wij.56.1415927793910; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:136:5180:1d09:7b84:e5b9? (t2001067c0370013651801d097b84e5b9.hotel-wireless.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:136:5180:1d09:7b84:e5b9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm1418549wiv.10.2014.11.13.17.16.32 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B411)
In-Reply-To: <7BBBA272-AE34-4EC4-9CD0-4CEDF40165CB@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:16:30 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77423131-7D11-4814-9D98-52AC39DFB4FB@gmail.com>
References: <BD206B2B-8788-4595-8349-18404BE0A592@gmail.com> <7BBBA272-AE34-4EC4-9CD0-4CEDF40165CB@gmail.com>
To: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/w7gGRegtqY-nDNibKvI2qghoJ4A
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposing "Encapsulation Format" LCAF type
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:16:38 -0000

> Shouldn't we have some way to allow option for encapsulation? Each encap

Not sure what you mean exactly Damien.

If you want some general option negotiation, remember the working group was not thrilled about capability negotiation in the mapping database?

Dino

> system has a set of parameters that should be possible to add here. 
> 
> Damien Saucez 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 10:45, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I've been having discussions with various people and there is a rough concensus that if the LISP mapping system can aid in helping encapsulators know what encapsulation formats a decapsulator supports, we will get better interoperability in the face of the myriad of overlay data-planes that are being proposed in the IETF.
>> 
>> Here is the section that was added to the LCAF draft:
>> 
>> <PastedGraphic-10.png>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Proposed -07 and html diff also enclosed.
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>> <draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-07.txt>
>> <rfcdiff-lisp-lcaf-06-to-07.html>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status