[lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 02 February 2016 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807571B2D3B; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:39:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Alvaro Retana" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160202163941.8955.70959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:39:41 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/wHPD_sO0zAgfuCqYpxVR8hD5FtE>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: [lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:39:41 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Joel in that some more detail on the deliverables would be
nice — also, some of the expected interactions should be called out; for
example, for the multicast item I would expect interaction with the pim
WG, etc.