Re: [lisp] VPNs and Initial Applications

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Fri, 25 October 2013 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9087011E83F3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.874, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69Ll3FBZ+6Ur for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD59F11E815E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 1D40118C1E5; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20131025132506.1D40118C1E5@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:25:06 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] VPNs and Initial Applications
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:25:16 -0000

    > I'm really lost as to what the document should say/talk about in this
    > sub-section, and I'm not sure what that "L2 and L3" should expand into
    > ...
    > Can people give me some idea what this sub-section should say? 

... Crickets.

Look, this change was made because _somebody_ asked for it. That person, at
least, ought to be lending a hand.

If I don't get any response, I'm very tempted to just put it back the way it
was.

	Noel