Re: [Lln-futures] What is LLN?

done
On 09/26/2012 05:55 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> Ulrich, Geoff - if you intend to change the meaning of "LLN" to match "low power and lossy networks", it would be good to fix the BoF description in the wiki before today's BoF request at 11:30AM EDT.
>
> - Ralph
>
> On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:06 PM 9/25/12, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree with Adrian that we should not use the same acronym for different terms (but maybe it was just a glitch in the BOF request?).
>>
>> I don't think that low-power should be excluded.
>>
>> Best
>> Ulrich
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>> Bit of a fundamental question to be asking at this stage?
>>
>> ROLL defines LLNs as "Low power and lossy networks"
>> The BOF request defines "Lossy Link Networks"
>>
>> Clearly lossy link networks form a subset of low power and lossy networks. But
>> is the intention to exclude low power considerations?
>>
>> It would really help to not define the same acronym with two different but very
>> close meanings (notwithstanding WAD [RFC5513]).
>>
>> Could you clarify and simplify?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lln-futures mailing list
>> Lln-futures@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lln-futures
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lln-futures mailing list
>> Lln-futures@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lln-futures