[lmap] LMAP WG Status Update - No Meeting Planned for IETF100
Jason Weil <jweil72@gmail.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 15:32 UTC
Return-Path: <jweil72@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2154133072 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-pD0S5QORs7 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C623C13306E for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c82so631554vkd.4 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uyo68Tdje/1VQwT4nOv4ffweoUWYfSbZG11p/MlxVt4=; b=QcPFyYIIeXTx68zA3nTZqkLiSDTMw8q2N8G/um0jQuMYKrz4Jxm+jwEnjU1imQi4xI wwCwZ7XL27tFIYA+Lxwhf3Ge/XJze6X6kDX9UDsdd/CwwhXe9P/94Q/RYAonkY1snREQ mba8aOPbqbuPPsUEwwJHBpdmsm03Bc5yIL1YmdBInuVfBxR5+KmCW/5KKVfqVlR4a75l XMGpJTts+kiDHVB9X6EcluE53JUZalfkVwCCmB+oM0ySDDL3qJtX2DrV3O1/bR1bEhUB rhq3F4ARQLH8RsQrVcRfdRSCaIw3WSHtZe3854tPu3rMWxuBZVxU08FzgFL4Cw8I1Jwo QWuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uyo68Tdje/1VQwT4nOv4ffweoUWYfSbZG11p/MlxVt4=; b=ehcWWsTTa9qf28iON4mQKD+WrNN48jDpnxDtZWflMYdFs5pD30tl9LhHC1pDzHc1D6 LnpUJpXOvHtcD4m34HJL6RuqvgIJu8PO/WxmxNgxGOyaT6JQSUDMV9aa1rf88RiyeuKx LsjPKj9EnCLkpXwSaFd4vX4WffSZrxvUKqdenzhnV3gTrD8GEuQhiu3Mnt+oI3WLijK7 Ms+mYqTOVNUqIhqYVLPa/lndBVTMf0wYF4+0g2Fx9epN1pnABvF+/Sa+8UONgJBcW2k6 8yVfD2vLvlxL7nCmCEWogco7MWTSZmcDf/+X+fcQAxFtVCT2iKCrG91X1u8Iju12W5kH V3sQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUim+FqS4o01Esi3ENWUAoHTD66zi6Mn+IUhVeNKvpOOzzA1DoiI 93hU7RJyYK/jHp/tKIZPzz3zMugkw3/Hp7FAwTD7QQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA3CX4hpoa/CgNJYO1Ao5gBZQmISVjFbgYsY5xdAv9DXqHhZkv5Mq/aaZKCPNd6zZFnmUpHTem5aHD6E/4wbeI=
X-Received: by 10.31.229.1 with SMTP id c1mr11620985vkh.140.1505316772479; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.82.195 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jason Weil <jweil72@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:32:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD9RRF1wn-YzxyyW-tmHHTFfEfc9Yh8GpZs9n4K8AgsOWjRsuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: lmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114db7bc7f9bcc055913dfe1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/C8ylelmfwPNCx53cOIP8bSPYVa0>
Subject: [lmap] LMAP WG Status Update - No Meeting Planned for IETF100
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:32:56 -0000
All, Seeing as there is no active discussion taking place on the list or any work planned in the near term for the final working group document ( draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-restconf/> ), Dan and I are not planning on requesting a meeting for IETF 100 in Singapore. If there is any interest for any new or future work in Singapore please let us know quickly. And Congratulations again to the authors (big cheers to Juergen) and reviewers of RFC8193 (Information Model) and RFC8194(Yang Model). Thank You, Dan and Jason