[lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-restconf status and way forward
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Fri, 02 June 2017 10:13 UTC
Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74893126DED for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGWXVKMeKqd8 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5EB12E05C for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 03:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00B7F6A for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id wsIZUu3zAy3O for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.47]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F5F200A6 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naqqdmQvVu4w; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5BE200AB; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D32D13F684DD; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 12:13:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:13:40 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: lmap@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170602101340.GA93882@elstar.local>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: lmap@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/E-yq0Ic1gk2k5JO6RhJ1SEy9a_c>
Subject: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-restconf status and way forward
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 10:13:45 -0000
Hi, I have posted a new version of draft-ietf-lmap-restconf. I have tried to address the Dan Romascanu's review comments and I tried to better align the text with the other specifications. There are a couple of open issues where I would like to have guidance from the WG or the chairs. a) The document header says Standards Track but since this document does not really define anything but merely explains how the various pieces fit together, I think the document should be Informational. b) I added some figures to explain how connection establishment works with RESTCONF with and without Call Home. I think Tim wanted to have this better explained. It would be nice to receive feedback whether the figures address the comment. c) There are two examples in the appendix. I still need to update them to align them with the final version of the data model and to move to JSON encoding. (We once decided that the YANG model shows XML encoded examples while the RESTCONF document shows JSON encoded examples.) If the document becomes Informational, I think it is better to move the examples inline instead of having them in an appendix. d) I do not know what to do about section 5. Do we have to discuss in this document how RESTCONF configuration is done? My preference is to not go there since (a) the relevant specifications are still being worked on in NETCONF - so we have to wait on these specifications getting stable and (b) there may be several different ways to configure certain features and I do not know how to select what we should document here and I see also a certain risk of ending up with something that is inconsistent with the actual specifications. My preference would be to simply point to the work-in-progress documents. If the answer to a) is Informational, to b) Tim's request has been addressed, to d) we do not go into the details of RESTCONF configuration, than I can do c) relatively quickly and we may even move this document to WG last call before IETF 99. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
- [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-restconf status and way fo… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-restconf status and wa… Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)
- Re: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-restconf status and wa… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [lmap] draft-ietf-lmap-restconf status and wa… Benoit Claise