Re: [lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?

Hi,

I do not believe that we can really declare success without having
completed one of the key goals of our charter. My opinion is that
draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt needs to be done. We may be able to do it
without keeping the WG active. If the WG closes, my preference would be
OPSAWG rather than Independent Stream.

Regards,

Dan

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
> >
> > The charter speaks about the control and report protocols.
> > draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt, now expired, describes in 7 pages how
> > RESTCONF can be used with a YANG data model for LMAP.
> >
> > Is it time to declare success and move on?
> > Unless there are spectacular activities in the next 2 or 3 weeks, I'll
> take
> > action before stepping down as AD.
> >
> > Note that publishing draft-ietf-lmap-restconf could still proceed in the
> > Independent Submission Stream, if there is some future energy to do so.
>
> draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt depends on the NETCONF/RESTCONF
> configuration drafts done in the NETCONF WG; these NETCONF I-Ds have
> not been moving because people put priority on getting NMDA out of the
> door.
>
> Since nobody seems to be pushing for getting
> draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt done, it might be OK to just let it
> go.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>