Re: [lmap] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 21 April 2017 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61627129B5B; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULUgF6mY5vue; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8867129AFF; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1070; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492799978; x=1494009578; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VBj0hcaH9hb1XC7wh4aYTuouzTfOTy7G8MhVo7RYTl0=; b=CgGnT7KOrTTDHBxBaD3+ENW7cdVkE5IE2r1a4TJP5myN5Xe+Mb0nTjyu 1yoNuFCy5l1gybttxYTp/7h5XdTF8CPVZw+kxOHF1oiHu2k86GpEzGvwI 2hrjEl3UciZZoS5wLSzkV1dhJujquq3l4sJTG0NeC96Pg5r/3vlQGuUCK c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DpAADkUPpY/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhDWBDI18c5BUIWiMMohKgg8shS5KAoRKGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRY?= =?us-ascii?q?BBTIBBVELGC5XBgEMCAEBihgOrBmLIAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEfhlOBX?= =?us-ascii?q?SsLgmOCPYF9AQGGAAEEiTqUB4cXi2+CAFWEXoNChmKLOT+IIR84gQYmHQgYFUS?= =?us-ascii?q?FHoFMPjUBhweCLgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,230,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="652339213"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2017 18:39:35 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.90] (ams-bclaise-8919.cisco.com [10.60.67.90]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3LIdZ6J022441; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:39:35 GMT
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org
References: <148967599467.14149.3188235856151065534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> <0471a144-fa4e-c20d-30fa-d55f4d590e20@cisco.com> <20170421183222.GB20407@elstar.local>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <abc48496-853d-d9d4-5050-a9cb9cd130c4@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:39:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170421183222.GB20407@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/NdelwFhDRWxF3MGNJdFT6C6q29Q>
Subject: Re: [lmap] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:39:40 -0000

On 4/21/2017 8:32 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:33:38PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> On 3/23/2017 8:10 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:53:14AM -0700, Benoit Claise wrote:
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> DISCUSS:
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> As agreed during the IESG telechat, holding a DISCUSS until the new YANG
>>>> security considerations template including RESTCONF is agreed upon.
>>>>
>>> I have updated the document to use the wording posted by Benoit to the
>>> NETMOD list on March 16:
>>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg17890.html
>>>
>>> Benoit, does this resolve the issue?
>> Yes, thanks Jürgen. Removing my DISCUSS.
>>> The updated I-Ds and the diffs
>>> can be found here: http://beadg.de/lmap/
>> Perfect.
>>
> Shall I post new I-Ds and then we are done with these two LMAP
> documents?
Yes please.

Regards, B.
>
> /js
>