Re: [lmap] Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 16 March 2017 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF2312E870; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LjXJfZlRS8ha; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A592A12ECEB; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E46C2CCC1; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:21:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFfwtPNYTiIA; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:21:53 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DF42CC5E; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:21:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CB8F321D-D12E-4739-87AA-32F20AFB3153"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <148814339074.2901.10793232146724828053.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:21:48 +0900
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lmap-information-model.all@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, lmap@ietf.org
Message-Id: <391122AA-5077-4208-AD6A-4104BDAAEDA0@piuha.net>
References: <148814339074.2901.10793232146724828053.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/fof5yVNc2vZ6kP1JGI3O6p7994c>
Subject: Re: [lmap] Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:21:57 -0000

Thanks for your review, Russ. For what it is worth, I agree with your comment/question about the credentials. It is fine to have different arrangements for different situations, but Russ’s question was really not about that but whether the CA information mentioned earlier is a part of a specific part of the information model (ma-credentials). I think that deserves clarification.

Jari