[lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Sat, 03 February 2018 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87B412D850 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 06:21:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgp3PzNB5QqB for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 06:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2221289B0 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 06:21:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=654; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517667676; x=1518877276; h=from:subject:to:cc:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=CKjc72Gyh0bRjfv0dHp59kTlnn2GRODj5VI9SaPFNR0=; b=jqo05sB5dK+wOy3/CbE3rEV8T8n+5Z58DMVz807LXv5e4m508b6bJU+K 2TxAziyj1bo3nG2SvNK6SXCi3hFjXEAsufN+P2ithasmKkggHaS50DShq IOakyZjOeD9c7iScGlhWsa0TcnKYT6EldgtXrswwAykql2Mbq4pEHeZTy U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CAAQD8xHVa/xbLJq1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUnhA2LGKcZggMKhTEKgxIUAQEBAQEBAQECax0LhU0VQTUCJgJfDQgBAYoxujOCJ4UAg3aCBgEBAQEGAQEBASSBD4Nbg2yBaCmHb4NPgmUFil6JXI9rlXGCBYoyh34Cj1+IF4E8NiKBUDMaCBsVPYJHhHdAjGQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,454,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1832879"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2018 14:21:12 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w13ELCIN007204; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:21:12 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Cc: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f3e7abc7-493a-5d9f-6eb1-89f3a553e8e6@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:21:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/n_mwpIFNNVjU_ZWc-TCUYWKJLnc>
Subject: [lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:21:18 -0000

Dear all,

No LMAP meeting at 99, 100, and 101.
No emails on the list for 6 months except from the chairs.
No active LMAP drafts.

The charter speaks about the control and report protocols.
draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt, now expired, describes in 7 pages how 
RESTCONF can be used with a YANG data model for LMAP.

Is it time to declare success and move on?
Unless there are spectacular activities in the next 2 or 3 weeks, I'll 
take action before stepping down as AD.

Note that publishing draft-ietf-lmap-restconf could still proceed in the 
Independent Submission Stream, if there is some future energy to do so.

Regards, Benoit