Re: [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-15.txt

<philip.eardley@bt.com> Fri, 13 January 2017 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <philip.eardley@bt.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B80D1295F2 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:19:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LoRhAU5qlcn for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpb1.bt.com (smtpb1.bt.com [62.7.242.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E3B129BC4 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EVMHT01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.42) by EVMED06-UKBR.bt.com (10.216.161.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:19:05 +0000
Received: from rew09926dag03d.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.30) by EVMHT01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.342.0; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:19:05 +0000
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.22) by rew09926dag03d.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:19:05 +0000
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net ([fe80::d514:fe50:560c:401e]) by rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net ([fe80::d514:fe50:560c:401e%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:19:05 +0000
From: philip.eardley@bt.com
To: dromasca@gmail.com, lmap@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-15.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSbYYXMqaV45iVZUmjKgnUY2QT/KE2Y0+A
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:19:05 +0000
Message-ID: <9f226ecca6174261a9383590b5bb64ba@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <CAFgnS4U9_XtAsvZzvYH7cTv2i9weVtbGxm1xccWkzk9DS4yB-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4U9_XtAsvZzvYH7cTv2i9weVtbGxm1xccWkzk9DS4yB-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.216.161.29]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9f226ecca6174261a9383590b5bb64barew09926dag03bdomain1sy_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/skjiC2wJ-7Nj_AEyYCpEIUxcESM>
Subject: Re: [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-15.txt
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:19:11 -0000

Yes, I agree that the LMAP Framework should be an Informative ref.
Best wishes
phil
From: lmap [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dan Romascanu
Sent: 13 January 2017 10:16
To: lmap@ietf.org
Subject: [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-15.txt

Hi,
I should have noticed this early. While preparing the IESG submission I ran idnits and it rightly shouts that [RFC7594] is a downref. Do we really need this as a Normative Reference? I feel not, and I suggest to move it to Informative References.
If nobody has a problem with this, I would suggest that Juergen issues a revised version to fix. If you see a problem, please say it.
Thanks and Regards,
Dan