IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lmap] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-16

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Tue, 31 January 2017 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B78F1293F9 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:48:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxg5euTLITV2 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5AA129586 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:47:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D0D6D1; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.205]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 9l12IJvAskJ5; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4C1200AD; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4yj8p-1xyOk; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9796200AC; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 90A553E60D99; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:47:57 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <20170131194757.GA78531@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, lmap@ietf.org
References: <2CB94EA6-A5F9-4770-9E76-0C7E8676E9CF@cooperw.in> <20170124160720.GB36955@elstar.local> <31441568-4107-4D08-9D7C-99C6A71F0FE0@cooperw.in> <20170126085354.GA43055@elstar.local> <80A34C5F-7E20-41CF-99DF-2222399CFF07@cooperw.in> <20170131094427.GA59387@elstar.local> <8456A767-C0A1-447D-959C-9E090AB4B50B@cooperw.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8456A767-C0A1-447D-959C-9E090AB4B50B@cooperw.in>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/yQSz_sTzCwA8WvlPZNhI9HuZ8dg>
Cc: lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-16
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:48:00 -0000

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:15:52AM -0500, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >> 
> > 
> > The status reports go to the LMAP controller, so I do not really see
> > why there is a specific risk since the controller has access to the
> > device ID anyway.
> 
> I still am missing what is the rationale for sending the device ID in the status reports. I thought the agent ID was meant to uniquely identify the MA.
>

So here we go. I propose the following change:

  - The ma-status-agent-id becomes optional.
  - The ma-status-device-id becomes mandatory again.

Rationale:

  If a device does not yet have an MA-ID, then the device-id must be
  accessible such that the controller can configure an MA-ID.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email