[lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-15.txt
Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Fri, 13 January 2017 10:16 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BB412943B for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jbpl_NVlNdzy for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DDF1293E1 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 11so49093992qkl.3 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:16:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VlIZmgbQZovKansS05wi6BgIPm4fBFh/T39YXWPyO5Y=; b=kKnPUiajIej48MdzbedDXVRS1v3qnLOYdQsnSidr/T1//2qSMa9LOIGvbm74Y0usiw mR7hc5/2BZ1x+VexZLxbyBxztpEB7CtbEkXiwCSHQWyestcj1X80GeBU2d57umt/meK8 Ri/B1nAwixUfYUYnhYoeD/EozJuNcUqqzT6R+bV0FpWBD9setapfANDxxll5N8dLjT4o AmrVVtg1mV6yGEWXsT8qmnUkV75bYHF94gZT1ztD6I2sfJUg/uQ+nWDKCE7bP7PccgJg AsWq+DRs0rzsMBczI/WIbR7q5NwB+6YxrWEzTL0vVFah1cKnIk/IxpqOzCFWhImsKiJR BhpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VlIZmgbQZovKansS05wi6BgIPm4fBFh/T39YXWPyO5Y=; b=KrAUGsbOp5C8gFnBUVKS/5Xfw/3F0Wbk1ob76amri74LGLAeHrrPCL9hAhfmgepfqb Ab1WUBxWy9cBiX2HFUeFtcf5iZYQm6F/izLt0HVSHI/iVGtGt/Z7tvOYuGhZ9/yh0MyZ nNJYXA1KDA7o9V3JFcp0E/GcqC2KAMrluJlE01MP7Lj9cflnYxrV0o9aUIF+vB248ExK 2827AO3uVeFI64YDTemBKIvTFfYfK5m72GIs4bNQ8T/MF029QKcn2pufmoBHQ9KdZmJu qld77vPv5IZMCXHtuLkoB3QZ1lFdN4tKNlF5PsHSIFW80KsEe/iUDrxz5JotXp07/4sP FldA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIRtMb0XqiXfQS9SdpmX8W6EPJoSJY4Ha6ivHIJP08AL3LPG0BtynhGH62XhPJODH8nJvqfFJDQnN6J7w==
X-Received: by 10.55.43.158 with SMTP id r30mr20227854qkr.28.1484302562726; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:16:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.40.11 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:16:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:16:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4U9_XtAsvZzvYH7cTv2i9weVtbGxm1xccWkzk9DS4yB-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: lmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1149430efda0c20545f71e0e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/zOugFRv3-Q-6rfzTBtR8Cd8jt5E>
Subject: [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-15.txt
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:16:06 -0000
Hi, I should have noticed this early. While preparing the IESG submission I ran idnits and it rightly shouts that [RFC7594] is a downref. Do we really need this as a Normative Reference? I feel not, and I suggest to move it to Informative References. If nobody has a problem with this, I would suggest that Juergen issues a revised version to fix. If you see a problem, please say it. Thanks and Regards, Dan
- [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information-mod… Dan Romascanu
- Re: [lmap] downref in draft-ietf-lmap-information… philip.eardley