Re: [LOOPS] IETF106: LOOPS side meeting on Tuesday 08:30, Orchard Room

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 18 November 2019 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EC7120931 for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:52:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJ9MKMN-Dw2r for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE00120915 for <loops@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-9c88.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9c88.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.156.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47Gr4Z6fb0zyRD; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:52:46 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <c172b80c-04ee-9786-153f-9e1dda57fdd8@steinwurf.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:52:44 +0800
Cc: loops@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 595777961.825265-af0d6dfab888d314ee985292c59bedce
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3D026CEF-AF7D-4CDE-8A5B-8CE5DCF749D1@tzi.org>
References: <AAF1E19E-37C1-4A9D-B92A-621054B06AF6@tzi.org> <c172b80c-04ee-9786-153f-9e1dda57fdd8@steinwurf.com>
To: "Morten V. Pedersen" <morten@steinwurf.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/4kx7wm2tuEtoR3sz-jhp6u3ysLU>
Subject: Re: [LOOPS] IETF106: LOOPS side meeting on Tuesday 08:30, Orchard Room
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:52:52 -0000

On Nov 18, 2019, at 21:39, Morten V. Pedersen <morten@steinwurf.com> wrote:
> 
> Will remote participation be possible for this one?

There is no official remote participation support for side meetings at the IETF.
I will set up an iPad with Jitsi; please click the following link to join the meeting:
https://meet.jit.si/ietf106-loops

(There is also phone access, but that won’t work too well given the limited audio capabilities we’ll have:

Dial-in: +1.512.402.2718 PIN: 4183817416#

To see the dial in phone numbers for this meeting:
https://meet.jit.si/static/dialInInfo.html?room=ietf106-loops
)

What I can’t help with is the time zone (08:30 SGT == 00:30 UTC == 01:30 CET)…

Grüße, Carsten

> 
> - M
> 
> On 11/17/19 6:07 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> After all the feedback we received at the non-WG-forming LOOPS BOF at IETF 105, we have scheduled another side meeting for IETF 106:
>> 
>> Tuesday 8:30-9:45, Room: Orchard
>> 
>> After some introduction, we want to make some progress on discussing more detailed design issues, including:
>> 
>> - encapsulations
>> - retransmission operation (and the role of acknowledgements)
>> - sketching an FEC mode (note that we are also on the agenda of NWCRG (*))
>> 
>> and then maybe spend some time more clearly outlining the work to be done in a potential LOOPS WG.
>> 
>> This round should be interesting to transport protocol designers, tunnel protocol designers, and FEC experts.
>> 
>> The drafts you may want to look at for a quick update where we are:
>>  • Use cases (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-tsvwg-loops-problem-opportunities-03)
>>  • Solution sketch (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-welzl-loops-gen-info-02)
>>  • Encapsulation (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-loops-geneve-binding-00)
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> (*) https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/agenda-106-nwcrg
>> 
> 
> -- 
> LOOPS mailing list
> LOOPS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops