Re: [LOOPS] Draft LOOPS agenda for IETF 105 uploaded

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 16 July 2019 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5966120150 for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_wxcY2qvuAV for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BFCF12004F for <loops@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 01:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCE40.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45nv670Hdpz108Z; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:42:22 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <371AA0CB-21CB-458C-BBB8-D3F3BA56FC41@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:42:22 +0200
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, loops@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 584959340.3604521-1b5a99aaf0edc8fad8b578d5abec25d8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FFE3F5D5-F32D-48AE-9465-1C37D2AF2A35@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-fWNpNmbJ+txe_iA53xGOCfhnj7YOQKpmmP_6hsktryhg@mail.gmail.com> <371AA0CB-21CB-458C-BBB8-D3F3BA56FC41@ifi.uio.no>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/7yAvMYAaXnTqUBgy6HZhFyXlhGE>
Subject: Re: [LOOPS] Draft LOOPS agenda for IETF 105 uploaded
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:42:29 -0000

On Jul 11, 2019, at 23:45, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> if i understand this right, my slot is 10 minutes and that doesn’t seem realistic to me. 20?

I’m not sure we have 20, but we can move over 5 minutes from the first use case presentation.
(Maybe another 2 or 3 from the “related work” part.)

So this could be:

Time	Topic	Responsible	Time used	Time Remaining
10	Introduction, Scribe Kidnapping, and Agenda Bashing	Chairs	10	110
10	"What is LOOPS?”					Carsten	20	100
10	Main use case [1]					Yizhou	30	90
10	Two specific use cases					(2)	40	80
18	Solution sketch [2]					Michael	58	62
12	Related work that is not LOOPS, for context	Carsten?	70	50
20	Technical discussion…					All	90	30
20	Whether and where to do this work in the IETF		All	110	10
10	Questions and hums for the AD				Chairs	120	0

[1] draft-li-tsvwg-loops-problem-opportunities-03
[2] draft-welzl-loops-gen-info-00

Right now, we plan to have an administrative discussion on Saturday morning near the Hackathon  (say, 09:00; some of us will not yet be there, notably Michael).  This could then morph into a few technical discussion groups, with potential changes being discussed to the slides (so it would be good to have them available before Saturday morning).

On Sunday 09:00 we could then have a slide review meeting (including Michael).

All these pre-meetings are not meant to be long.  We’ll have then informally, around the Hackathon [3] where most of us are involved in one thing or another already.  If you haven’t registered for that: You still can (at no cost to you) at https://www.ietf.org/registration/ietf105/hackathonregistration.py

[3]: https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/hackathons/105-hackathon/

Grüße, Carsten